My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/13/1993
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1993
>
4/13/1993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:53 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 12:57:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/13/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
restriction -that any new debt must be subordinate to it. We <br />refinanced our water and sewer assessments to property owners in <br />North County and in Rockridge. They were paying 9.75 percent and <br />the new bonds would allow financing on the assessments at 6.75 <br />percent, which will be a saving for the property owners. <br />Additionally, by refinancing the six bond issues that we had for <br />water and sewer and consolidating them into one issue, we have a <br />future value savings of $1,620,700.00. The Farmer's Home <br />Administration bonds were 40 -year bonds; these will be 32 -year <br />bonds. <br />Arthur H. Diamond, of Fishkind & Associates, financial <br />advisors to the County, stated that the bond issues are the result <br />of a lot of hard work. It was a complicated situation because six <br />bond issues were refinanced. In the process we removed the first <br />lien of Farmer's Home Administration from the County's financing, <br />we unified the system under one bond document, and we made that <br />document more flexible for the County. Mr. Diamond pointed out <br />that the County's reputation in the financial market is respected <br />because of the way the County is governed and that makes a <br />difference in any financing. <br />Ed Bulleit, representative of William R. Hough & Company, <br />distributed a booklet containing all the pertinent figures of the <br />new bond issue. He characterized it as one of the most complicated <br />requests for proposals in his experience because we are refinancing <br />six different transactions. In the initial phases of this project, <br />other firms said that this deal would never get done. Mr. Bulleit <br />admitted that his firm doubted whether we could ever accomplish a <br />rate that would produce this transaction. He stated that because <br />of County staff's efficient work we moved within a week and a half, <br />had this deal insured and got an A rating from Moody's. This <br />document is one of the most flexible water and sewer documents to <br />be rated A. He stated that it was to the County's- benefit to <br />remove the Farmer's Home Administration lien because of the <br />potential for graduation and because of the restrictions. Mr. <br />Bulleit further explained that by defeasing the six bond issues we <br />also eliminated the time and expense involved with administering <br />those six individual bond issues. <br />Chuck Beick, Rhoads & Sinon, bond counsel for Indian River <br />County, explained that two resolutions were prepared. The first <br />resolution authorizes the retirement of the six bond issues that <br />are being retired, authorizes the capital project with the new <br />money portion of the bond issue and authorizes the bond issues. <br />The second resolution awards the bonds to William R. Hough & <br />Company and specifies details for the paying agent, the escrow for <br />39 <br />APR 13 199 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.