Laserfiche WebLink
JUN 151993 <br />BOOK 89 F,,� , F -1 <br />k) - 83 7 <br />Ms. Garling explained that she used a builder other than the <br />developer to build her home. She thought the property was zoned <br />for single family, since the entire area is comprised of single- <br />family homes. <br />Commissioner Macht asked, and Director Keating confirmed that <br />this cannot be handled with a variance because regulations for a <br />variance require a unique situation that creates a hardship. <br />commissioner Adams felt that this is a reasonable request, and <br />she pointed out that the cost to the County of changing the LDRs <br />would be greater than the cost of rezoning the property. <br />Attorney Collins advised that it is not legal for the County <br />to spend public money for a private purpose. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Macht, the Board (3-1, Commissioner <br />Adams voting in opposition, Chairman Bird being <br />absent), denied the request for a County- initiated <br />rezoning of Colonial Gardens Phase 1, as recommended <br />by staff. <br />AS -BUILT RESOLUTION AND ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PAVING AND DRAINAGE <br />IMPROVEMENTS - 10TH COURT SW BETWEEN 9TH STREET SW (OSLO ROAD) AND <br />11TH STREET SW <br />The Board reviewed the following memo dated May 26, 1993: <br />38 <br />