Laserfiche WebLink
M M M <br />It is also anticipated that impacts on adjacent agricultural areas <br />will be minimal. As required by Future Land Use Element Policy <br />6.3. urban uses which encroach on active agricultural areas must <br />provide adequate buffers. <br />For these reasonsp staff feels that the proposed Rural land use <br />designation will be compatible with surrounding areas. <br />Potential Impact on Environmental Quality <br />As indicated in the Existing Land Use Pattern section of this <br />report-, much of the subject property has been altered for <br />residential or agricultural development. Since most of the land <br />has been disturbed, few natural areas remain within the bounds of <br />the subject property. Therefore,, the proposed change will not have <br />a significant effect on environmental quality. <br />With respect to the natural area within the subject property's <br />limits, it should be noted that any residential development will <br />need to comply with the * county's land development regulationsr <br />including its environmental provisions. Various environmental <br />permits, including land clearing and tree removal permits'r must be <br />obtained prior to development. In addition, the county's native <br />upland plant community set-aside requirement will apply to <br />properties at least five acres in size. <br />The,proposed amendment will not result in an increase in potential <br />adverse environmental impacts on the subject property. <br />Agricultural use is largely exempt from county permitting,, and <br />therefore is not required to obtain the above mentioned permitst <br />and is exempt from the county's native upland plant community set- <br />aside requirement. For these reasons, the county,, has more <br />opportunity to regulate impacts associated with residential <br />development than impacts associated with agricultural use. <br />Need for USA Expansion and Land Use Redesignation <br />In order to efficiently and economically expand the county <br />utilities system to serve approved development,, density along <br />programmed and existing lines must be increased. The most feasible <br />action to increase density along new lines is to allow development <br />on both sides of roads that serve as USA boundaries to connect to <br />the system and to redesignate land adjacent to lines. TO <br />accomplish this the USA must be expanded. <br />Of particular importance with this request in the impact of the <br />land use change on the county's residential allocation ratio. A <br />residential allocation ratio is the measure of total residential <br />units allowed under the land use plan compared to the number of <br />residential units expected to be needed through the plan's planning <br />horizon based on population projections. The following formula is <br />used to calculate the residential allocation ratio: <br />Total number of units allowed - Existina units <br />Projected number of units needed (1990-2010) <br />When Indian River County and DCA entered into a stipulated <br />settlement agreement, to bring the county's plan into compliance <br />with state requirements,, both parties agreed to a residential <br />allocation ratio. Given the agreed upon ratio,, the county's <br />residential land use designations were acceptable to DCA. <br />Subsequently, the stipulated settlement agreement was implemented <br />through an amendment to the county's comprehensive plan. That <br />amendment,, which was found in compliance by DCA,, formally <br />established an acceptable residential allocation ratio for the <br />county. 19 <br />JUN 22 1993 89 893 <br />-A <br />