Laserfiche WebLink
Fr- 800% 8 9 <br />JUN 22 1993 <br />Bill Wodtke, 6325 lst Street S.W., formerly a County <br />Commissioner, quoted the following excerpt from staffs 'memo: <br />Need for USA Expansion and Land Use Redesignation <br />In order to efficiently and economically expand the county <br />utilities system to serve approved development, density along <br />programed and existing lines must be increased. The most feasible <br />action to increase density along now lines is to allow development <br />on both sides of roads that serve as USA boundaries to connect to <br />the system and to redesignate land adjacent to lines. TO <br />Accomplish this the USA must be expanded. <br />of particular itkl?ortance with this request Is the impact of the <br />land use change oft the county's residential allocation ratio. A <br />residential allocation ratio is the measure of total residential <br />units Allowed uftdGk the land use plan compared to the number of <br />residential units ftected. to be needed through the plan's planning <br />horleon based oft 06pulation projections. The following formula in <br />used to calculate the residential allocation ratios <br />Mr. Wodtke presumed that the only reason f or this proposed <br />change is because the County wants to expand utilities. He <br />understood that the County wants to extend utilities to the <br />commercial nodes to encourage business and employment, but there <br />are no developers requesting utilities. He also pointed out that <br />policy 1.37 requires that we must reduce the urban service area by <br />3200 acres in other parts of the county if we add the proposed 3200 <br />acres. Mr. Wodtke also felt this redesignation could be considered <br />an increase of urban sprawl. <br />Michael Zeigler, 3375 12th Street, representing property north <br />of 26th Street between 82nd and 90th Avenues, opposed the proposed <br />land use changes and urged the Board not to transmit the amendment. <br />He contended that priority has been shifted from the Comprehensive <br />Land Use Plan For the Year 2010 to the Master Utility Plan which <br />was presented to the Board on March 30 by Brown and Caldwell. The <br />Master Utility Plan enumerated $154 million worth of utility <br />projects which would be triggered by certain events. Mr. Zeigler <br />argued that the trigger events have not been satisfied in any of <br />the elements. The residential allocation ratio is not a real <br />problem and we have excess capacity both in water and wastewater <br />treatment. He quoted from the Future Land Use Element Policy 1.37 <br />as follows: <br />26 <br />