Laserfiche WebLink
F JUN 22 1993 <br />U -1 <br />BOOK 89 PA,F 8.94 <br />Mr. Robinson pointed to his property on the enlarged map and <br />demonstrated how his 17 -acre parcel is divided into urban service <br />area and non -urban service area. He has a 150 -acre parcel with so <br />acres of it on Kings Highway within the urban service area and the <br />remainder on Oslo Road which is outside the urban service area. He <br />felt that the County should into consideration the fact that <br />agriculturally zoned property value which fluctuates. He requested <br />that his property be included in the urban service area as <br />originally proposed by staff. Mr. Robinson discussed the fact that <br />the Board was hearing only from those opposed to the change. There <br />are property owners who are in favor of the change, thought they <br />were to be included, and are not aware of the exclusion. <br />Raymond Sawyer, 39th Place in Wabasso, came before the Board <br />representing Ruth Sawyer and Aileen Farley wh6 own 39.5 acres next <br />to Mr. Feldman's property which was recently rezoned. Mr. Sawyer <br />urged the Board to change the land use designation so that Ms. <br />Sawyer's and Ms. Farley's 39.5 -acre parcel could be developed. <br />aohn Eddy, 7370 Oslo Road, spoke in favor of excluding the <br />Oslo Road corridor from this proposal. He could not foresee any <br />development from 54th to 75th Avenues because of the two packing <br />plants that currently exist and the proximity to the industrial <br />node. He urged the Board to exclude the Oslo Road corridor from <br />the proposed change. <br />Rebecca Rudenberg, 1832 39th Avenue, owner of a grove on 19th <br />Street, opposed the proposal and urged the Board to make no change <br />in the land use designation. <br />Chairman Bird clarified, and Director Keating agreed that <br />according to Policy 5.9 of the Sanitary Sewer and Potable Water <br />Sub -Element of Future Land Use Policy, property which is located <br />outside the urban service area cannot access the County utility <br />lines even if the property is physically accessible to the lines. <br />The urban service area boundary delineates where we provide the <br />service. <br />Discussion ensued, and Director Pinto recounted the history of <br />urban service areas. The Master Utility Plan contains the design <br />of the master lines and these master lines are paid for from impact <br />fees. The internal lines which access proposed developments are <br />paid for through assessments because there is a specific benefit to <br />that specific development. Director Pinto emphasized that the <br />Utility Master Plan was created at the direction of the Board based <br />30 <br />