Laserfiche WebLink
M M M <br />on the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The urban service area was <br />established and utility services are required within those areas. <br />The Utilities Department is not requesting an expansion of the <br />urban service area nor construction of more lines to service that <br />area. There are properties which have physical access to the <br />utility lines and we must refuse to provide service because of our <br />policy. As a result, the cost of those lines must be borne only by <br />those who benefit. <br />commissioner Adams reasoned that the policy needs to be <br />changed if that is the only reason we refuse service. She thought <br />we should not make a blanket change but rather take the requests <br />for service on a case by case basis. <br />Director Keating pointed out that urban service areas are the <br />principal tools used in urban planning. <br />commissioner Adams emphasized that her intention is not to <br />eliminate urban service areas. <br />Discussion ensued, and commissioner Eggert pointed out that <br />this policy was dictated by the State Department of Community <br />Affairs (DCA) and we are dealing with DCA definitions of urban <br />service area and utility services. <br />Chairman Bird asked whether we are prohibited from making a <br />change if a property owner requests service. <br />Director Keating explained that the Board can make changes to <br />the Comp Plan at any time, but it is a question of whether the DCA <br />finds us in compliance -with our plan. He further explained that <br />the proposed change was initiated because of the change to the <br />Feldman property. The DCA reluctantly agreed to the Feldman change <br />and suggested that there may be other situations with the same <br />circumstances which we should analyze to see what the relationship <br />might be because adequate data and analysis is needed to justify a <br />Comp Plan change. Their philosophy is that if circumstances <br />warrant a change and that set of circumstances also could apply to <br />other property, they should be treated equally. The plan should be <br />driven by consistent applications of principals and policies. The <br />urban service area is our plan, our management tool to decide where <br />services will be put, how they will be expanded, how funds will be <br />spent, and how and where capital improvements will be made. It is <br />also the driving force to establish boundaries within which we <br />allow urban development and outside of which we only allow <br />agricultural and rural development. When we say the urban service <br />area boundary does not really mean anything and we can expand <br />outside that boundary, or we do not have to provide the services <br />within it, we have essentially lost the reason for having the urban <br />service area boundary. <br />31 <br />BOOK 8 9 NA " F <br />!".895 <br />