My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/22/1993
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1993
>
6/22/1993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:53 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 1:10:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/22/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M M M <br />on the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The urban service area was <br />established and utility services are required within those areas. <br />The Utilities Department is not requesting an expansion of the <br />urban service area nor construction of more lines to service that <br />area. There are properties which have physical access to the <br />utility lines and we must refuse to provide service because of our <br />policy. As a result, the cost of those lines must be borne only by <br />those who benefit. <br />commissioner Adams reasoned that the policy needs to be <br />changed if that is the only reason we refuse service. She thought <br />we should not make a blanket change but rather take the requests <br />for service on a case by case basis. <br />Director Keating pointed out that urban service areas are the <br />principal tools used in urban planning. <br />commissioner Adams emphasized that her intention is not to <br />eliminate urban service areas. <br />Discussion ensued, and commissioner Eggert pointed out that <br />this policy was dictated by the State Department of Community <br />Affairs (DCA) and we are dealing with DCA definitions of urban <br />service area and utility services. <br />Chairman Bird asked whether we are prohibited from making a <br />change if a property owner requests service. <br />Director Keating explained that the Board can make changes to <br />the Comp Plan at any time, but it is a question of whether the DCA <br />finds us in compliance -with our plan. He further explained that <br />the proposed change was initiated because of the change to the <br />Feldman property. The DCA reluctantly agreed to the Feldman change <br />and suggested that there may be other situations with the same <br />circumstances which we should analyze to see what the relationship <br />might be because adequate data and analysis is needed to justify a <br />Comp Plan change. Their philosophy is that if circumstances <br />warrant a change and that set of circumstances also could apply to <br />other property, they should be treated equally. The plan should be <br />driven by consistent applications of principals and policies. The <br />urban service area is our plan, our management tool to decide where <br />services will be put, how they will be expanded, how funds will be <br />spent, and how and where capital improvements will be made. It is <br />also the driving force to establish boundaries within which we <br />allow urban development and outside of which we only allow <br />agricultural and rural development. When we say the urban service <br />area boundary does not really mean anything and we can expand <br />outside that boundary, or we do not have to provide the services <br />within it, we have essentially lost the reason for having the urban <br />service area boundary. <br />31 <br />BOOK 8 9 NA " F <br />!".895 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.