7/6/1993 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

there. It was for mutual reasons. She pointed out that the County commission has responded very quickly to various concerns that the City has expressed, and Councilwoman Ginn explained that is why she and Councilman Jack Grossett are here today. Chairman Bird suggested that we request the County Attorney to research whether the County has any standing here or any ability to seek a court injunction to stop this project in its tracks so that health and public safety issues can be addressed. Attorney Vitunac advised that he would research all possibilities. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously (4-0, Commissioner Tippin being absent) directed the County Attorney to see if the County has standing in this matter to seek a court injunction to halt the placement of these utility poles until the health and safety concerns are addressed; and, if it is found that the County does not have standing, the County Attorney is to see if there are other ways that we could help and offer that assistance to the homeowners' group and their attorney, Bruce Barkett. In addition, the Board directed staff to see what can be done about putting something in our ordinances that might increase distance from poles to property owners. I SCHEDULE TWO PUBLIC HEARINGS TO CONSIDER LDR CHANGES The Board reviewed the following memo dated 6/24/93: TO: James E. Chandler County Administrator 9"ION HEAD CONCURRENCE: -Robert M. 1(cilitibf, AIW Community Development(-45irector FRON: Stan BolingA, %CP Planning Director DATE: June 24, 1993 SUBJECT: Approval of Hearing Dates for Two Evening Board Hearings to Consider LDR Amendments It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of July 6, 1993. 23 6 1993 BOOK 89 FA-UF,979