My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/27/1993
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1993
>
7/27/1993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:54 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 1:08:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/27/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� � a <br />County Attorney Charles Vitunac clarified that the urban <br />service area boundaries are roadways which have either water or <br />sewer lines. <br />Chairman Bird led discussion regarding the recommended Rural <br />land use designation. He pointed out that it could be argued that <br />it is inequitable to have one side of a roadway designated R (1 <br />unit per acre) while the property across the road is designated L-1 <br />(3 units per acre). <br />Director Keating explained that staff considered the <br />residential allocation ratio and the fact that changing the land <br />use designation to anything more intense than R would project more <br />residential units than can be absorbed within the time horizon of <br />the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The R designation is the least <br />intense land use allowed in an urban service area. The strongest <br />reason for recommending the R designation is because the area under <br />discussion is in the south county, west of Kings Highway and east <br />of 82nd Avenue, which is generally a flood prone area where <br />densities are restricted. <br />Chairman Bird clarified that the Oslo Road Corridor eventually <br />will have sewer and water lines from U.S.J1 to I-95 and will serve <br />the planned industrial node. He realized that the property owners <br />on that corridor have mixed feelings as to whether they are in <br />favor of or opposed to that corridor being included in the proposed <br />change, and he read aloud the following ��lppettttt�er: <br />STOC MORE GROVE <br />2419 EAST COMMERCIAL BOULEVARD <br />FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA 33308-4042 <br />(305) 491-0100 <br />July 22, 1993 <br />Members of the Planning & Zoning Commission <br />Indian River County, Florida <br />` County Administration Building <br />Attns Mr. John Wachtel, Staff Planner - <br />1840 25th St. <br />Vero Beach, Florida 32960 <br />o <br />Re: County Initiated Request to Amend the Comprehensive Plan by <br />Enlarging the Urban Service Area and Redesigr.ating <br />Approximately 3200 acres from AG -1- to R (LUDA 93-01-0100) <br />Dear Honorable Members: <br />I respectfully request that this letter be read at your workshop <br />meeting on July 27, 1993 by Mr. John Wachtel. <br />I am a very concerned property owner of approximately 80 acres <br />lying on the north side of 9th St., S.W. (Oslo Rd.) between 58th <br />Avenue and 74th Avenue, Vero Beach, F1. My concerns are that the <br />final decision makers, being yourselves, of this proposed land use <br />plan change are being partially misdirected by some of the <br />surrounding vocal neighbors. <br />17 <br />BOOK 33 f u 53 <br />JUL 27 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.