My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/27/1993
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1993
>
7/27/1993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:54 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 1:08:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/27/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Chairman determined that no one else wished to be heard <br />and thereupon closed the public discussion. <br />Commissioner Adams opposed a blanket change in the urban <br />service area. She felt it would be better for individual property <br />owners to request a change. The problem is caused by our policy of <br />not allowing the lines to extend outside the urban service area. <br />The recommended broad change to that policy would allow an owner to <br />request expansion of the urban service area to a specific parcel. <br />If we do not expand the urban service area, utilities staff may not <br />know what densities and capacities are needed, but that is not <br />impossible to overcome, and we should design capacity with a little <br />extra as we go. Commissioner Adams was concerned about protecting <br />the rights of the large parcel owners who want to continue to live <br />on 5 or 10 or 20 acres. They should not have to worry about <br />protecting their property every time one of their neighbors <br />requests a change in land use. Commissioner Adams was in favor of <br />the recommended broad change to policy 5.9 of the Potable Water <br />Sub -Element and policy 5.9 of the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element. <br />Commissioner Eggert stated that the broad change alternative <br />was her first choice but she realized that we would have complex <br />problems with that choice. Property owners would have to request <br />a change in the urban service area as well as their land <br />designation and their zoning, and the urban service area boundary <br />would be very uneven. Commissioner Eggert favored the alternative <br />where utility services could be extended within a quarter -mile <br />fringe of the urban service area. She further commented that our <br />Comp Plan is due for re-evaluation in the next year or two. <br />Chairman Bird pointed out that in spite of our best efforts to <br />encourage orderly growth, there are some areas in the county that <br />are more conducive to development, such as the lightly wooded and <br />upland areas, which seem to be scattered throughout the county. If <br />those developers want the service and are willing to pay, that is <br />where we should go with the utilities, realizing that it does not <br />always follow the master plan. <br />Director Keating advised that the concept of the urban service <br />area includes not only utilities but also emergency services. The <br />Comprehensive Plan encourages infilling and utilizing the <br />facilities within the urban service area and discourages urban <br />sprawl. <br />23 <br />L_JUL 27 <br />M90 BOOK 90 FvF 59 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.