My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/27/1993
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1993
>
7/27/1993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:54 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 1:08:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/27/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FJUL 27 199.3, <br />BOOK 90 FA -7 <br />CE 6® <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Adams, that a Comprehensive Plan <br />amendment be brought forward, both for the potable <br />water sub- element and the sanitary sewer sub - <br />element, to allow expansion of the utility services <br />to those properties located outside the urban <br />service area and either wholly or partially within a <br />quarter mile of the urban service area boundaries. <br />Under discussion, Commissioner Macht clarified that the effect <br />of this proposed amendment would be to allow anyone who is <br />currently living outside of but within a quarter mile of the <br />service area to be able to get service if service is readily <br />available. Water and sewer service currently is prohibited outside <br />the urban service area. This amendment will not change the urban <br />service boundary and will not change any land use designation. <br />Chairman Bird asked how the amendment would affect utilities, <br />and Director Pinto responded that property owners would have to <br />make a decision whether they want to be included at the time of the <br />assessment. <br />Commissioner Eggert wanted to make every effort to clarify the <br />possible confusion and make absolutely clear to property owners <br />what consequences will follow for those who do not choose to be <br />included in the expansion, and not just immediate consequences but <br />long range consequences as well. The costs should be spelled out <br />in detail so that they fully understand the import of not being <br />included in the expansion. <br />Director Pinto explained that the normal assessment procedure <br />would provide the means to furnish that information. The property <br />owners would be notified of the assessment, and if they do not want <br />to be included, they will be given all the information so that they <br />have a clear understanding of the consequences. If they decide to <br />be excluded, that fact would become a part of the public hearing. <br />Discussion ensued regarding the possible ways to handle <br />property which will be excluded from the assessment. <br />Director Pinto advised that the size of the project would be <br />determined and those calculations would dictate the size of the <br />lines. The important thing is to inform the property owners of the <br />consequences of being excluded from a project. <br />Commissioner Macht asked for a restatement of the motion. <br />Commissioner Eggert restated the motion. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. <br />It was voted on and carried unanimously. <br />24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.