Laserfiche WebLink
AUG ® 3 1993 <br />BOOK 90 PKIF'1:32 <br />Commissioner Adams liked Chairman Bird's idea and suggested <br />that we contact someone from the University of Florida with this <br />type of expertise. <br />Director Pinto stressed that preventive measures and <br />maintenance measures have to continue in order to keep ahead of the <br />problems. <br />General Services Director Sonny Dean reported that he just <br />spent 2 days at a seminar on sick buildings that focused on the <br />sick courthouse in Polk County. The first thing they did with <br />their courthouse was to conduct an employee evaluation which gave <br />them a good idea of what to look for. He reported that people were <br />there from the University of Florida trying to bring themselves up <br />to date on the subject. He reviewed the following memo listing the <br />measures taken to solve the problems in the Administration <br />Building: <br />DATE: JULY 26 1993 <br />TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER <br />COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR <br />FROM: H.T. "SONNY" DEAN, DIRECTOR <br />DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SER ES <br />SUBJECT: UTILITIES DEPARTMENT - IN -DOOR AIR QUALITY <br />Since 1988 this Department has responded to numerous complaints <br />concerning in -door air quality in the Utility Department offices, <br />located in our County Administration Building. Attached is a <br />chronological listing of actions taken by Buildings and Grounds <br />personnel that have been recorded since November, 1988. <br />Not included in this list are the times that on request from your <br />office I have made visits to that location to determine the presence <br />of odor problems. None of which have we been able to ascertain or <br />determine if these reported odors were similar to those from other <br />areas of this building at given times. <br />In June of this year, I officially requested the National Institute <br />for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) to perform a Health <br />Hazard Evaluation of the County Administration Building. NIOSH <br />responded to our request with a letter stating that due to their <br />work load they would not be able to perform the requested <br />evaluation, at this time. <br />24 <br />