My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/23/1993
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1993
>
8/23/1993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:54 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 1:16:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/23/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r Auc 23 1993 <br />BOOK 90 P,ti;F 1S4 <br />It was the consensus to direct staff to take amendment #1 <br />forward to the September 7 meeting. <br />Amendment #2 <br />Commissioner Eggert was very supportive of the 50 acres <br />because she felt it should be all inclusive and because she didn't <br />think that 25 acres would provide what a true resort should be. <br />Commissioner Adams noted that there would be more open, green <br />space with 50 acres. <br />It was -_the consensus to take amendment #2 forward to the <br />September 7 meeting. <br />Amendment #3 <br />Commissioner Eggert was very supportive of this amendment <br />because as a resident of a concdo, she would be right out front <br />fighting against a conversion if she was confronted with that <br />situation. Commissioners Adams and Macht also were supportive of <br />#3 in that it would prohibit the conversion of an existing <br />residential development into a residential resort. Chairman Bird <br />supported #3 also, but felt that perhaps we should look at the Sea <br />Oaks' rental program which seems to be compatible with the <br />residents' lifestyle, and determine if we should modify our <br />ordinance to allow that sort of thing if it is, indeed, compatible. <br />He felt staff was smart enough to look at the way that situation is <br />working there presently and see if we can adopt some ordinances <br />that will fit their situation rather than trying to make them fit <br />ours. The consensus was to go take amendment #3 forward to the <br />September 7 meeting. <br />Amendment #4 <br />Commissioner Eggert was very supportive of requiring the <br />inclusion of commercial. <br />The consensus was to go forward with Alternative #2, which <br />would require a residential resort project area to include CL or CG <br />zoned property. <br />Amendment #5 <br />The consensus was to stop this proposed amendment from going <br />any further. The Board directed staff to look at the definition of <br />residential on the length of stay as there seemed to be a large <br />gray area there. <br />After a brief recess, Chairman Bird requested that the record <br />show that no members of the public remain in attendance. He noted <br />24 <br />_ M <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.