9/7/1993 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r EPn k BOOK 9p F,vF 367 •PD Review/Approval Process The approval steps in the PD process are as follows: Approval Needed Reviewing Body 1. Conceptual Plan/Special Exception P&ZC recommendation; BGC final action 2. Preliminary PD/Site Plan P&ZC 3. Land Development Permits Staff 4. Final PD (plat) BCC Pursuant to Section 971.05 of the LDRs, the Board of County Commissioners is to consider the appropriateness of the requested use based on the submitted site plan and suitability of the site for that use. The Board may approve, approve with conditions or deny the special exception use. The County may attach any conditions and safeguards necessary to mitigate impacts and to ensure compatibility of the use with the surrounding area. The project is proposed to be constructed in three phases. If the special exception use and conceptual PD plan application are approved by the Board of County Commissioners, the applicant may then proceed with the project by obtaining preliminary PD approval for phase I of the project. Planning and Zoning Commission Action At its August 12, 1993 meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the project with original staff report conditions 1B, iC, 1D, lE, 1G, 1H, and 1I along with conditions 2A and 3A (Note: original condition 1F -was adequately addressed prior to the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting and was deleted at the meeting). The Planning and Zoning Commission voted separately to consider condition lA, which was related to the length of stay.issue. The Planning and Zoning Commission voted 3-2 against applying a minimum stay requirement to the project. However, the motion failed since 3 affirmative votes of the seven member commission do not constitute a majority. Even though the Planning and Zoning Commission's action resulted in no recommendation on original condition lA (length of stay), staff has not included a length of stay condition in its recommendation. This is based upon the Board of County Commissioners' direction to staff at the August 23, 1993 LDR amendment hearing. In addition to making recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners regarding the residential resort use and conceptual PD plan, the Planning and Zoning Commission authorized the use of street names within the proposed development, subject to staff approval of the selected road names. ANALYSIS: 1. PROJECT SIZE: Parcel A: 17.74 acres Parcel B: 10.41 acres Parcel C: 42.39 acres Gross Project size: 70.54 acres 30 _ M