My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/7/1993 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1993
>
9/7/1993 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:55 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 1:23:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/07/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Under section 3F, item 14, 'Residential Migmnt IIousing...." sub: kb), sub 3 "Froof that the land....." <br />requires that the facility be located only in agricultural area. This is rather strange because the idea is to <br />provide for off site housing not necessarily attached to any particular farm. On down to (c) sub. 2 requires a <br />minimum of 20 acres wluch is unduly restrictive and them sub. 3 which limits the use to "...four (4) persons <br />per acre". These provisions make the idea of off site migrant housing to be owned and maintained by someone <br />not owning any agricultural property such as a labor contractor (licensed, of course!). <br />Fran, farm worker housing, or for that matter affordable housing for the lower income service people <br />in this county is a real problem. The best hope for a solution is to entice industry to build such units. <br />Unfortunately, affordable housing is like "clean, light industry". It defies definition. Everybody wants it but <br />NAII3Y! The proposed LDRs you faxed to me would lead we to the conclusion that someone vim -As to <br />provide for this type of housing but regulate it to a point of being unfeasible. What we need are solutions. <br />Not excuses. <br />Planning Director Boling explained that the three changes in <br />the proposed farmworker housing LDRIs listed in staff's memorandum <br />address specific concerns expressed by agricultural business <br />owners. <br />Commissioner Adams commented that migrant housing in the urban <br />service area has not been addressed. <br />Community Development Director Bob Keating responded that <br />migrant housing is already allowed in various residentially zoned <br />districts within the urban service area. <br />Michael Galanis, environmental health director, advised that <br />he was asked to be here tonight after some concerns were raised at <br />the first public hearing about utilities. He confirmed that <br />current state standards allow on-site septic systems to serve <br />projects generating wastewater flow of up to 10,000 gallons per <br />day, and permitting could be obtained to construct a package <br />treatment plant for projects generating wastewater flow greater <br />than 10,000 gallons per day. Community well permits are available <br />from The Department of Environmental Protection to provide water. <br />The Chairman asked if anyone wished to be heard on any of the <br />other proposed amendments to the LDRs. There being none, he closed <br />the Public Hearing. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously adopted <br />Ordinance 93-29, amending chapters 902, 911, 913, <br />914, 954, and 971 of the Land Development <br />Regulations. <br />9 <br />BOOK 90 PnF423 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.