9/7/1993 (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BOOK 90 PAGF 422 7 3) A residential resort would infringe on existing streets, recreational facilities, community buildings and open space in established neighborhoods within the community. Mr. Scarmuzzi urged the Board to pass the proposed residential resort LDR amendments. He asked whether the pending ordinance doctrine invoked in August will have an effect on any applications. Attorney Vitunac explained that the pending ordinance doctrine applies to Sea Oaks because the developer was placed on notice that the ordinance was pending at every material stage of the process. He was notified that this hearing would be held tonight and that he will be expected to comply with the ordinance if it is adopted. If the ordinance is adopted at tonight's meeting, staff intends to hold the Sea Oaks developer to the new ordinance requirements. It was determined that no one else wished to be heard on the proposed residential resort LDR amendments and the Chairman closed the first portion of the public hearing. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously approved the four changes to existing residential resort LDRs, as listed above in staff's memorandum. Farmworker Housing and Remaining Amendments The Chairman requested that the following letter be placed in the record: Graves Brothers Company AUG 1993 P. O. Boa 277 C014MUNITY Wabasso, FL 32970 DEVELOPMENT DEPT. Phone 407-589-4356 Fax 407-589-5901 r Fax .IessaLve To: Commissioner Fran Adams From: J. Richard Graves, Jr. Date: August 25, 1993 Subject: Proposed changes to LDRs for migrant housing and farm tenant housing Thank you for asking for my comments on the above. My comments may be classed as from someone who doesn't understand the issues but here goes anyway. I thought I saw the reason behind placing a definition for the two uses in the LDRs but when I read the staffs proposals the two definitions seem to come back together. Pll start with the "tenant housing'. item # (b) 3 under "Additional information ..." provides that tenants "are employed in active on-site agricultural....". In my case we have multiple locations and a person may live in Wabasso and work in St. Lucie county. Item # (c) 1 under "Criteria for..." the site must be 20 acres. That is rather large unless it is a part of an agricultural operation Item 4, same heading again provides for on site employment. Item 7, same section excludes these types of dwellings from the urban service area. TI -.is could be a problem when the area is expanded and the expansion area includes agriculture. Might be a problem now. 8