Laserfiche WebLink
1. Require residential resort projects to include CL or CG zoned <br />property. <br />2. Delete any requirement relating to a minimum length of stay. <br />These two changes have been made to the proposed ordinance (see <br />attachment #2.). To summarize, the ordinance now proposed would <br />make the following changes to existing residential resort LDRs: <br />1. Residential resort projects would be reviewed and approved as <br />planned development (P.D.) projects. <br />2. The minimum residential resort project area would be increased <br />from 25 acres to 50 acres. <br />3. No portion of a residential resort project would consist of a <br />portion of an existing or approved multi -family or single- <br />family residential project. <br />4. Residential resort projects would be required to include CL or <br />CG zoned property. Within the project, the area of <br />residentially zoned property to commercially zoned property <br />could not exceed a ratio of 3:1. <br />These provisions are contained in sections lA and 1B of the <br />proposed ordinance. <br />•Farmworker Housing <br />At its August 23rd hearing, the Board directed staff to get input <br />from larger agricultural operations within the county regarding the <br />proposed farmworker housing LDRs. Also, the Board directed staff <br />to research the water and wastewater treatment implications of <br />locating "tenant dwellings" and "migrant housing facilities" <br />outside of the Urban Service Area. <br />It should be noted that "tenant dwellings" and "migrant housing <br />facilities" are.. special use categories intended to apply only to <br />farmworker housing developments located outside of the Urban <br />Service Area, in areas designated as agricultural. In staff's <br />opinion, the proposed LDRs offer agricultural -business owners an <br />opportunity to develop farmworker housing outside of urban areas, <br />close to the agricultural lands on which they work. Although such <br />an opportunity may enable some affordable housing to be provided <br />for farmworkers, it also warrants special regulation and review to <br />ensure that such housing developments are compatible with the rural <br />character of agriculturally designated areas. Farmworker housing <br />developments located within the Urban Service Area would be treated <br />the same as any other residential project in terms of approval <br />process (site plan or subdivision) and density (based upon zoning). <br />-Urban Service Area/Utilities Ramifications <br />Planning staff has verified in discussions with Utility Services <br />Director Terry Pinto that a utility franchise could be granted for <br />a farmworker housing project located outside the Urban Service Area <br />(Note: Sanitary Sewer sub -element Policy 6.1 and Potable Water <br />sub -element Policy 6.1 allow for on-site water and wastewater <br />treatment facilities for projects located outside of the Urban <br />Service Area.) Mr. Pinto indicated that a franchise would be <br />required for any system (package plant or septic) that would serve <br />more than one building. The actual water and wastewater treatment <br />facilities used would need to meet state standards. According to <br />Assistant Environmental Health/HRS Director Glenn Schuessler, <br />current state' standards allow on-site septic systems to serve <br />3 <br />BOOK (99PAGE'��� <br />SEP 7 199 J <br />