My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/8/1993
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1993
>
9/8/1993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:55 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 1:26:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/08/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
advised that the County Administrator discussed the budgets with <br />each of the constitutional officers prior to the budget workshops <br />and they reduced their budgets to what they feel is the bare <br />minimum. If the Commission decided on an across-the-board 10 <br />percent decrease, the constitutional officers could appeal, and the <br />State possibly could override the Board's decision. <br />Administrator Chandler outlined the budget process. He stated <br />that the budgets are submitted to the Administrator and the <br />Director of the Office of Budget & Management. Together they <br />analyze the proposed budgets with the department heads and the <br />constitutional officers. Administrator Chandler is ultimately <br />responsible for recommending the budget to the Board. Prior to <br />submitting the -proposed budget for fiscal year 1993-94, he cut over <br />$3 million from the submitted budgets. He did not recommend 13 new <br />positions that were proposed in the General Fund budget, and <br />recommended 3 additional positions which are under the jurisdiction <br />of the Board. The budget was analyzed line by line and capital <br />outlay, which consists of vehicles and equipment, was "gutted," <br />along with other line items. Additional cuts were made by the <br />Board. Emergency Services was reduced $314,000 and the Sheriff's <br />budget was cut by $250,000. There were further cuts at the July <br />workshop. <br />Administrator Chandler stated that there is a 64 percent <br />increase in the Sheriff's budget. This increase falls within the <br />General Fund and MSTU. There are other smaller increases in the <br />General Fund budget because of the requirements of the Americans <br />with Disabilities Act, certain outside agencies, court reporters <br />and a number of other items. The Clerk's budget was increased <br />$150,000. There is an increase because of 2 new positions in <br />Buildings & Grounds. Emergency Services District budget was cut <br />$316,000 and included within that reduced budget are 6 proposed new <br />positions. The Emergency Services budget is below the rolled -back <br />rate. The Supervisor of Election's submitted budget is $11,000 <br />below the current year budget. <br />Chairman Bird stated that the Board sets a minimum goal, which <br />is the rolled -back rate. He explained that rolled -back means if <br />you had a house with the same appraised value this year as last <br />year and we applied that rolled -back rate, your taxes would not go <br />up. He further explained that even with the Administrator's $3.5 <br />million cut and the Board's further cuts during budget workshops, <br />the budget is $2,382,196 above what would get us back to the <br />rolled -back rate. He pointed out, however, that if appraised <br />property value is increased, even with the same millage, the taxes <br />would go up. Also, there are other taxing bodies that may raise <br />17 <br />L_ SEP 8 1993 <br />BOOK 90 Far,F 485 <br />J <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.