Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />Ports, Aviation, and Related Facilities Figures 6.2, and 6.3 <br />The purpose of this amendment is to update the maps of the Vero <br />Beach Municipal Airport and the New Hibiscus Airport. Several <br />changes have recently occurred, including a change in a clear zone <br />at Vero Beach Municipal Airport, and these changes should be <br />reflected in the comprehensive plan (see attachment 4). <br />Water Sub -Element Policy 1.3, Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element <br />Potable Water Sub -Element Policy 1.3, Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element <br />Policy 1.3, and Capital Improvements Element Policy 3.5 set the <br />utilities Level of Service (LOS) standards for the county. Each of <br />these policies refers to county ordinance 84-18 which was replaced <br />by ordinance 91-9. Consequently, 84-18 is no longer current. The <br />purpose of this amendment is to update these policies so that the <br />County Utilities Ordinance is no longer referenced (see attachment <br />4). This change will ensure that the policies are and remain <br />accurate. <br />DESCRIPTION OF DCA OBJECTIONS AND COMMENTS <br />In its ORC report, DCA raised two objections to the proposed <br />amendment. One objection related to the proposed Citrus Highway, <br />while the other related to policies 1.3 of the Potable Water Sub - <br />Element, 1.3 of the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element, and •3.5 of the <br />Capital Improvements Element. <br />With reference to its objections regarding the proposed Citrus <br />Highway, DCA stated that the proposed amendment is inconsistent <br />with the requirements of Rule 9J-5, F.A.C. Specifically, DCA's <br />position is that because a Corridor Planning and Design Report <br />(CPDR) funded by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) <br />has not been completed, the proposed amendment is not supported by <br />adequate data and analysis, and lacks intergovernmental <br />coordination required by both the County and State Comprehensive <br />Plans. <br />DCA's second objection is related to the proposed revisions to <br />policies 1.3 of the Potable Water Sub -Element, 1.3 of the Sanitary <br />Sewer Sub -Element and 3.5 of the Capital Improvements Element. <br />These policies currently reference Utilities Ordinance 84-18, which <br />has been replaced by Ordinance 91-9. The proposed revisions amend <br />the policies to reference "the County Utilities Ordinance, as <br />amended." The basis of DCA's objection is that the proposed <br />amendment is inconsistent with the comprehensive plan amendment <br />procedural requirements of 5.163.3187, F.S. DCA's position is that <br />under the proposed amendment, future changes to the County <br />Utilities Ordinance would, in effect, change the comprehensive plan <br />without undergoing the required comprehensive plan amendment <br />process. <br />In addition to the referenced objections, the ORC report included <br />one comment on another portion of the proposed amendment. The DCA <br />comment related to the county's proposed amendment to Future Land <br />Use Element Policy 1.25. <br />Future Land Use Element Policy 1.25 <br />of commercial/industrial nodes. <br />eliminate these designations; in <br />simply as commercial/industrial <br />sentence of the policy is necessary <br />of commercial/industrial nodes. To <br />recommends that the first sentence <br />33 <br />NOV 2 3 1993 <br />currently designates five types <br />The proposed amendment would <br />effect, identifying all nodes <br />nodes. Deleting the second <br />to eliminate the five sub -types <br />add clarity to the policy, DCA <br />of the policy also be deleted. <br />