My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/7/1993
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1993
>
12/7/1993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:56 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 1:35:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/07/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DEC ti 1993 BOOK 91 <br />In contrast, there are only 1,115 acres of R designated land in the <br />County, less than any other residential land use designation. <br />Except for 40 acres along 58th Avenue, all R designated land is <br />located between C.R. 510 and the City of Sebastian. Approval of <br />this amendment would reduce the amount of R designated land in the <br />County to 956 acres. <br />Approval of this amendment would affect the rest of the R <br />designated land in the County. Since the subject property has <br />similar characteristics to all other R designated parcels along <br />C.R. 510, redesignating the subject property would likely result in <br />redesignation of all other R designated parcels. This would <br />eventually leave the county with no R designated land. <br />While the R designation serves as a transitional designation from <br />agricultural to urban uses, the large required lot size often makes <br />development prohibitively expensive, especially where utility <br />service is available. In contrast, the L-1 designation allows for <br />more cost efficient, compact and affordable development. <br />Concurrency of Public Facilities <br />This site is located within the county Urban Service Area, an area <br />deemed suited for urban scale development. The Comprehensive Plan <br />establishes standards for: Transportation, Potable Water, <br />Wastewater, Solid Waste, Drainage and Recreation (Future Land Use <br />Policy 3.1). The adequate provision of these services is necessary <br />to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the community. <br />To ensure that the minimum acceptable standards for these services <br />and facilities are maintained, the Comprehensive Plan and Land <br />Development Regulations also require that new development 'be <br />reviewed. <br />Policy 3.2 of the Future Land Use Element states that no <br />development shall be approved unless it is consistent with the <br />concurrency management system component of the Capital Improvements <br />Element. For land use amendment requests, conditional concurrency <br />review is required. _ <br />Conditional concurrency review examines the available capacity of <br />each facility with respect to a proposed project. Since land use <br />amendment requests are not projects, county regulations call for <br />the concurrency review to be based upon the most intense use of the <br />subject property based upon the requested land use designation. <br />For residential land use amendment requests, the most intense use <br />(according to the County's LDR's) is the maximum number of units <br />that could be built on the site, given the size of the property and <br />the maximum density under the proposed land use designation. The <br />site information used for the concurrency analysis is as follows: <br />1. Size of Area to be Redesignated: <br />2. Existing Land Use Designation: <br />3. Proposed Land Use Designation: <br />4. Most Intense Use of Subject <br />Property under Existing Land <br />Use Designation: <br />30 <br />±159 acres <br />R, Rural (up to 1 <br />unit/acre) <br />L-1, Low -Density <br />Residential -1 (up to 3 <br />units/acre) <br />159 dwelling units <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.