Laserfiche WebLink
_ M <br />Commissioner Eggert pointed out that the question is whether <br />or not they should meet temporary use permit criteria. <br />Commissioner Adams asked how the criteria and requirements can <br />be enforced to eliminate material being conveyed from other sites <br />to a temporary burn site. <br />Director Keating conceded that enforcement is a problem but <br />Sunnyland Clearing is the only non-public entity to apply for a <br />temporary off-site permit. <br />Discussion ensued regarding SWDD's need for mulching materials <br />to fill the recycling quota. Director Pinto explained that if the <br />Board's decision eliminates revenues for the District, those <br />revenues must come from somewhere else. The District depends <br />heavily on mulching to fill its percentage quota of recycled <br />material and will have to make up that percentage in other ways. <br />Commissioner Eggert led discussion regarding Planning <br />Department's control of enforcement of criteria at temporary burn <br />sites, and Director Boling advised that there is good cooperation <br />between the departments. <br />Dan Dietz, Fire Bureau Chief, described the criteria of fire <br />safety requirements at permanent burn sites. He explained that the <br />size of a pile of debris must be within certain limits, with 20 - <br />foot lanes on all sides of each pile to allow access for fire <br />trucks. If a given pile of*debris accidentally catches on fire, <br />the fire department can allow it to burn without causing other <br />piles of debris to catch on fire. He described the Fischer <br />permanent burn site, which has 2 or 3 several -acre lakes, and the <br />owner has put in a hydrant system so the fire department does not <br />have to haul water to fight a fire. <br />Commissioner Macht asked, and Director Keating responded that <br />staff objects to Alternative C as recommended by P & Z and PSAC <br />because there is no restriction or limitation on the size of the <br />stockpile, no consideration of the amount of truck traffic, and <br />there are some issues related to land use. <br />Commissioner Adams noted that P & Z recommended Alternative C <br />without the temporary burn criteria. <br />Commissioner Eggert preferred Alternative C with the criteria <br />which were included originally. <br />Public Works Director Jim Davis confirmed that we generate a <br />large volume of cleared material and transporting it in large <br />sections is more expensive than if it is chipped or in a <br />consolidated form. Setback requirements cannot be met on certain <br />rights-of-way and a temporary burn site permit saves the <br />transportation fund quite a bit of money throughout the year. A <br />chipping operation can be a problem because mulchers tend to grind <br />®EC 14 1993 BOK 91 FAGF 2,81 <br />I <br />