Laserfiche WebLink
The Vice Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if <br />anyone wished to be heard on this section. There being none, he <br />closed the public hearing. <br />Vice Chairman Tippin declared that it is the consensus of the <br />Board to follow staff's recommendation with Section 4 of the <br />amendments to the LDRs. <br />Commissioner Adams suggested, and the Board members agreed to <br />address Section 10 out of order because there were interested <br />parties in the audience. <br />SECTION 10: LIMITED AND HEAVY UTILITIES USES IN SINGLE FAMILY <br />DISTRICTS <br />Planning Director Stan Boling made the following presentation: <br />10. SECTION 10: LIMITED h HEAVY UTILITIES USES -IN SINGLE FAMILY <br />DISTRICTS <br />These amendments (Sections 10A, 10B, and 10C) would require special <br />exception use approval, rather than administrative permit use <br />approval, for limited utilities uses proposed to be located in the <br />RS -2, RS -3, and RS -6 single family zoning districts, and the RT -6 <br />two-family zoning district. Currently, special exception use <br />approval is required for all limited utilities uses in the RFD, RS - <br />1, RM -3, RM -41 RM -6, RM -8, and RM -10 residential districts. The <br />result of the proposed change would be that limited utilities uses <br />would be special exception uses in all residential zoning <br />districts. <br />Also, the amendments would allow heavy utilities. -�-as special <br />exceptions in the RS -2 and RT -6 residential districts. `Currently, <br />heavy utilities are allowable special exception uses in the RFD, <br />RS -1, RS -3, RS -6, RM -3, RM -4, RM -6, RM -8, and RM -10 residential <br />districts. The result of the proposed change would be that heavy <br />utilities would be special exception uses in all residential zoning <br />districts. <br />Staff and -the PSAC both recommend that the Board of County <br />Commissioners adopt the proposed amendment. On a 4-0 vote, the <br />Planning and Zoning Commission recommended adoption of the proposed <br />amendment. <br />The Vice Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if <br />anyone wished to be heard on this section. <br />27 <br />ii L_ DEC 14 1993 <br />BOOK 91 <br />