1/4/1994 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

PROPOSED D.O. AMENDMENT: -7 BOOK 91 PvF,978 The NOPC request would amend the Village Green/Countryside D.O. to effect the following three modifications: 1. Allow development of up to 120 single family lots and dwelling units (rather than 300 mobile home units) within the portion of the overall project owned by Sable Trace. Although the project developer is Sable Trace, the subdivision project is to be known as "Sabal Trace". 2. Reduce the total number of residential units allowed within the overall project from 1,448 (mobile homes) to 1,283 (1,163 mobile homes plus 120 single family homes). 3. "Update" the estimated overall project build -out date from 1984 to 2005. Approval of the NOPC request is necessary to accommodate Sabal Trace's plans to develop a portion of the overall project as a two phase single family subdivision (see attachment #3). CONSIDERATION OF THE REQUEST: Pursuant to FS 380.06 which governs DRIB, the county may determine that the request does not constitute a substantial deviation and may be treated as a proposed change or "minor amendment". As a minor amendment, a change in an approved D.O. can be made by the Board of County Commissioners without official approval from the Regional Planning Council. �In accordance with LDR section 916.05(1), the Planning and Zoning Commission considered the request at its December 9, 1993 meeting. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended 4-2 that the Board of County Commissioners make a finding that the NOPC request does not constitute a substantial deviation and that the Board approve the request by adopting a D.O. resolution that incorporates the ,D.O. conditions recommended by staff (see attachment #4). The Board is now to consider the request, and make a finding as to whether or not .the request constitutes a substantial deviation and approve, approve with conditions, or deny the request. ANALYSIS: *Determination: Not a Substantial Deviation F 0Dnnty,:. Department of .:,Community Affairs ajDCA!`'; and Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council (TCRPC) staff have reviewed the request pursuant to FS 380.06 and have indicated that the requ6st does not constitute a substantial deviation because the applicant has demonstrated that the project will have no unacceptable level of service impacts on area roadway links, that overall project density will be decreased and that project impacts will likely decrease, and that housing meeting building code standards will be developed In lieu of mobile home housing (see attachment #5). Therefore, staff concludes that the applicant has adequately rebutted any presumption that the request constitutes a substantial deviation and that the request may be treated as a minor amendment. Thus, all staff analyses indicate that the county should find that the request does not constitute a substantial deviation. 16 _ M