My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/5/1994
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1994
>
1/5/1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:04:22 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 1:40:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/05/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
J A N 5 19 94, BOOK 91 FACE 422 <br />that definition to include only the tower, but Commissioners Adams <br />and Bird agreed that it needs to be the total height. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Eggert, to delete the notarized letter <br />requirement; to be sure the terms 70 feet, above 70 <br />feet, and 70 or more feet, are consistent; to reduce <br />the guy wire anchor setback from 10 feet to 5 feet <br />from the property line; and to allow towers from 70 <br />to '140 feet as an administrative permit use as <br />proposed in staff's memorandum. <br />Director Boling suggested the definition of tower as <br />"everything above the ground, tower and antenna." <br />Commissioner Eggert preferred to simplify it to "overall <br />structure." <br />Director Boling assured the Board that we will have consistent <br />terms throughout the ordinance. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. <br />It was voted on and carried unanimously. <br />FISHING -RELATED COMMERCIAL SALES AND SERVICES <br />Planning Director Stan Boling continued his presentation: <br />•Fishing -related Commercial Sales and Services <br />Section 3 of the draft ordinance involved the LDR amendment <br />proposal to allow fishing -related commercial sales and services as <br />a special exception use in the A-2 and A-3 agricultural zoning <br />districts. At its December 14th meeting, the Board determined that <br />such commercial uses would not be compatible in agriculturally <br />designated and zoned areas. The Board found the proposed LDR <br />amendment to be.inconsistent with the existing LDRs, with the <br />comprehensive plan AG -2 and AG -3 agricultural land use <br />designations, and with the existing and proposed land uses in the <br />A-2 and A-3 zoned areas. Based.upon these findings, the Board <br />indicated that it would deny the requested amendment. Therefore, <br />staff has deleted from the ordinance the fishing -related commercial <br />sales and service amendment proposed by Warren Dill on behalf of <br />Richard Green. As a result of deleting that section, sections 4-14 <br />of the draft ordinance are now sections 3-13 of the "final" <br />ordinance (see attachment #2). In regards to these sections, no <br />changes have been made to the amendments shown in the draft <br />ordinance. <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.