My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/1/1994
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1994
>
2/1/1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:04:23 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 1:44:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/01/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Harshbarger's mother and he emphatically indicated to staff <br />that we are not to approach or talk to her. Staff has not taken <br />action on this purchase within the last year. <br />Commissioner Bird asked, and County Attorney Charles Vitunac <br />confirmed that condemnation would necessitate an updated, current <br />appraisal. <br />Commissioner Adams believed that we should not rush into <br />condemnation proceedings. We will be aware of any action by the <br />owner to renovate because he will need permits from the City of <br />Vero Beach, and at that point we should contact him again to see if <br />there is any change in his position. <br />County Attorney Vitunac advised that if the Board adopts the <br />resolution authorizing condemnation proceedings, staff first would <br />try to negotiate a price for purchase. The procedure could take 4, <br />5 or 6 months, depending on whether they contest the taking issue <br />or the value issue; it may be a friendly condemnation. <br />Commissioner Macht explained that the Courthouse Advisory <br />Committee expressed the opinion that we should complete the <br />purchase to square off that property. <br />Administrator Chandler explained that staff was following the <br />Board's direction to make the purchase if we could get it at a <br />reasonable price. Mr. Harshbarger has not changed his position, <br />and the buildings have been vacant and appear to be deteriorating. <br />Discussion ensued regarding the funds for the purchase of this <br />property. <br />OMB Director Joe Baird explained that the sales tax funding <br />for the courthouse has approximately $600,000 positive variance, <br />but a purchase of this size would cut it very close. He was <br />concerned about the unknowns on the new courthouse construction. <br />Commissioner Bird observed that when we discuss plans for the <br />next 5 years on the sales tax funds we can earmark some of those <br />funds for the purchase of this property if we feel it is necessary. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously denied <br />adoption of the resolution for condemnation <br />proceedings and directed staff to check with the <br />owners on a regular basis, at least once a year, to <br />pursue negotiations for purchase of these <br />properties. <br />27 <br />FEB 1994 BOOK 91 FACE 666 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.