My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/22/1994
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1994
>
2/22/1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:04:23 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 1:46:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/22/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r -BOOK <br />FEB 22 1994 <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously adopted <br />Resolution 94-41, to the governor and legislature of <br />the State of Florida, in support of preserving <br />county home rule authority to develop and impose <br />impact fees. <br />RESOLUTION NO. 94-41 <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY <br />COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, <br />FLORIDA, TO THE GOVERNOR AND LEGISLATURE <br />OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, IN SUPPORT OF <br />PRESERVING COUNTY HOME RULE AUTHORITY TO <br />DEVELOP AND IMPOSE IMPACT FEES. <br />91 PAGE 808 � <br />WHEREAS, Section (1) , Article VIII of the Florida Constitution, as <br />implemented by Section 125.01, Florida Statutes, was intended to enlarge the <br />power of counties to govern themselves through home rule, and state inter- <br />vention in the area of impact fees would be inconsistent with this important <br />constitutional right; and <br />WHEREAS, in respect to this home rule principle the authority of local <br />governments to impose impact fees has been firmly established in case law to <br />help fund the cost of providing facilities and services necessitated by growth <br />and development; and <br />WHEREAS, impact fee revenues are critical to funding local government <br />growth management plans, 'particularly in the critical transition period from <br />plan development to plan implementation; and <br />WHEREAS, impact fees are imposed to ensure that growth and develop- <br />ment pay their own way rather than having those costs shifted to current <br />residents; and <br />WHEREAS, Indian River County finds its current and proposed impact <br />fee ordinances are effective and legally sustainable without benefit of state - <br />imposed requirements and conditions; and <br />WHEREAS, Indian River County has developed and implemented local <br />impact fee ordinances for water, sewers, and traffic; and <br />WHEREAS, impact fee legislation would likely generate additional costly <br />litigation to defend both existing and future ordinances; and <br />40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.