My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/23/1994
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1994
>
2/23/1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:04:23 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 1:47:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/23/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FEB 23 r <br />BOOK 91 PAGE 81,8 <br />10. MINIMIZE ROAD IMPACT FEE INCREASES - In 1988 the County had <br />estimated a shortfall of $60 million dollars to purchase right-of-way and <br />construct roads over the next twenty years. This cost is figured in the <br />calculation of road impact fees adding to the cost of construction within the <br />County. <br />11. OPTIONAL SALES TAX CHARGED UP TO CAP OF $5,000.00 IN <br />PURCHASES (PER TRANSACTION) - (A maximum optional additional sales <br />tax paid on each item purchased of $50.00.) <br />Conclusion <br />The Indian River County Board of County Commissioners, on January 31, 1989 passed <br />ordinance 89-6 calling for a county -wide referendum on the levy of the one cent sales tax <br />to be held on Tuesday, March 14, 1989. Shortly thereafter the Optional Sales Tax was <br />endorsed by every City within Indian River County. The Chamber of Commerce, Taxpayers <br />Association, Civic Association, Gifford Progressive League, Board of Realtors, Association <br />of General Contractors and the Treasure Coast Home Builders Association all endorsed the <br />Optional Sales Tax at that time. The voters passed the Optional Sales Tax to go into effect <br />June 1, 1989. (60.3% voted for the tax and 39.7% voted against the tax.) <br />When promoting the Optional -Sales Tax, the Indian River County Board of County <br />Commissioners put additional constraints on the use of the sales tax by promising that <br />proceeds would be used only for essential capital projects that the County would have used <br />tax dollars to complete (i.e. ad valorem, gas tax). It was also emphasized that in the future <br />a good portion of Optional Sales Tax would go towards the purchase of right-of-way and <br />roads to help offset the deficit in the Comprehensive Plan. An additional commitment was <br />made to have a list of projects approved in five year intervals by the Board of County <br />Commissioners in a public hearing. The projects for the first five years were the Jail (Phase <br />III), Health Department Building and Courthouse. All projects have been completed with <br />the exception of the Courthouse scheduled to be finished in the summer of 1994. <br />The planning of the second five year list of projects has been initiated. The Budget Office <br />requested a list of major projects from each department with the projected estimated cost, <br />the year it will be needed, beginning construction date, length of construction time and <br />estimated annual operating costs for five years after project completion. <br />As expected, more projects were submitted than there was money available in the second <br />five years. The County Administrator and Budget office reviewed the requests and have <br />recommended projects that were felt to be consistent with the original plan. During the <br />review process, a significant emphasis was placed on the projects' affect on the County's <br />operating budget. The net affect of projects recommended will result in a net operating cost <br />increase of only. $517,375 over the next five years. <br />Attached is a list of the recommended projects for the Board of County Commissioners <br />review. A general overview will be presented at the January 25, 1994 Board meeting. Prior <br />to scheduling the public hearing, it is anticipated a more detailed explanation would be <br />presented and Board direction provided at a subsequent meeting or workshop. <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.