Laserfiche WebLink
r BOC1K 91 Pnr,E 059 <br />MAR 2 2 19:0 1 <br />property. He described the changes in the subject property caused <br />by urbanization. He stated that when that area was used for <br />agriculture, moving draglines in and out was no problem; now it is <br />a problem. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously approved <br />the land exchange and authorized legal staff to <br />prepare an appropriate agreement, as recommended by <br />staff. <br />129TH STREET, ROSELAND, MAINTENANCE MAP <br />The Board reviewed memo from Public Works Director Jim Davis <br />dated March 14, 1994: <br />TO: James E. Chandler <br />County Administrator <br />FROM: James W. Davis, P.E. <br />Public.Works Director Wy' <br />SUBJECT: 129th Street, Roseland <br />DATE: March 14, 1994 <br />DESCRIPTION AND CONDITION <br />A maintenance map is to be filed on part of 129th Street, to aid in <br />paving the road. The right-of-way mapped runs from the North line <br />of the Meidel Subdivision, recorded in Plat Book 9, page 56 of the <br />public Records of Indian River County, north to the South right-of- <br />way line of 79th Avenue. <br />The center of the 129th Street right-of-way south of 78th Avenue is <br />the common line between Lots 2 and 3, Section 30 of the Fleming <br />Grant. North of 78th Avenue it is the common line between Blocks <br />26 and 28 of the A.A. Berry Subdivision, recorded in Plat Book 2, <br />page 14 of the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. No <br />right-of-way was provided for when these subdivisions were further <br />divided by deed description, although a road was built and drainage <br />installed and maintained. Grass -areas are mowed on a regular basis <br />back to fence lines agreeing more or less with property corners set <br />35 feet each way from the common (center) line. <br />None of this area has been dedicated to public use by written <br />instrument. Attempts have been made by a homeowners' <br />representative to have owners dedicate the right-of-way, without <br />success. <br />ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS <br />An interest has been shown in having the roadway and drainage <br />brought up to standards. In order to do so, it will be necessary <br />to know how much right-of-way can be depended.upon to meet paving <br />and drainage requirements. The maintenance map will make it clear <br />that a certain -amount of right-of-way is in county possession. <br />This amount was determined through coordination with the Road & <br />Bridge Superintendent. <br />54 <br />