My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/12/1994
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1994
>
4/12/1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:04:24 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 1:55:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/12/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Corridor; recent development proposals in this portion of the <br />County (including a Disney Company resort); and the land owner's <br />proposed use of the subject properties. Together, these factors <br />indicate that the proposed node reconfiguration (moving the <br />commercial designation of 8.4 acres from the U.S. #1 Corridor to <br />the C.R. 510 Corridor) will supply a presently unmet demand for <br />commercially designated land along the C.R. 510 corridor. <br />For these reasons, the proposed amendment is logical and rational, <br />and will facilitate efficient land use. <br />Concurrency of Public Facilities <br />This site is located within the County Urban Service Area, an area <br />deemed suited for urban scale development. The comprehensive plan <br />establishes standards for: Transportation, Potable Water, <br />Wastewater, Solid Waste, Drainage, and Recreation (Future Land Use <br />Policy 3.1). The adequate provision of these services is necessary <br />to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the community. <br />To ensure that the minimum acceptable standards for these services <br />and facilities are maintained, the comprehensive plan requires that <br />new development be .reviewed. For land use designation amendment <br />requests, this review is undertaken as part of the conditional <br />concurrency determination application process. <br />As per section 910.07 of the County's Land Development Regulations <br />(LDR), conditional concurrency review examines the available <br />capacity of each facility with respect to a proposed project. <br />Since land use amendment requests are not projects, county <br />regulations call for the concurrency review to be based upon the <br />most intense use of the subject property based upon the requested <br />land use designation. For commercial/ industrial land use amendment <br />requests, the most intense use (according to the County's LDR's) is <br />retail commercial with 10,000 square feet of gross floor area per <br />acre of land proposed for redesignation. The site information used <br />for the concurrency analysis of Subject Property 1 is as follows: <br />1. Size of Area to be Redesignated: t8.4 acres <br />2. Existing Land Use Designation: M-1, Medium -Density <br />Residential -1 (up to 8 <br />units/acre) <br />3. Most Intense Use with Existing <br />Land Use Designation: 67 Dwelling Units <br />4. Proposed Land Use Designation: C/ I, Commercial/ <br />Industrial Node <br />5. Most Intense Use with Proposed Land Use Designation: 84,000 <br />square feet of Retail Commercial (Shopping Center in the 5th <br />Edition ITE Manual). <br />For residential land use amendment requests, the most intense use <br />(according to County LDR's) is the maximum number of units that <br />could be built on the site, given the size of the property and the <br />maximum density under the proposed land use designation. The site <br />information used for the concurrency analysis of Subject Property <br />2 is as follows: <br />1. Size of Area to be Redesignated: <br />2. Existing Land Use Designation: <br />APR 121994 45 <br />t8.4 acres <br />C/I, Commercial/ <br />Industrial Node <br />ROCK �� F'i`r �CJ+� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.