My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/12/1994
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1994
>
4/12/1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:04:24 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 1:55:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/12/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
APR 121994 BOOK 92 Fac 163 <br />Impact on the Residential Allocation Ratio <br />Of particular importance to this request is the impact of the land <br />use change on the county's residential allocation ratio. A <br />residential allocation ratio is the measure of total residential <br />units allowed under the land use plan compared to the number of <br />residential units expected to be needed through the plan's planning <br />horizon, based on population projections. The following formula is <br />used to calculate the residential allocation ratio: <br />Total number of units allowed - Existing units <br />Projected number of units needed (1990-2010) <br />When Indian River County and DCA entered into a stipulated <br />settlement agreement to bring the county's plan into compliance <br />with state requirements, both parties agreed to a residential <br />allocation ratio of 4.487. The information used to determine the <br />residential allocation ratio at that time was as follows: <br />1. Total number of units allowed: 119,739 <br />2. Existing units: 26,000 <br />3. Projected number of units needed (1990-2010): 20,887 <br />4. 1990 Residential Allocation Ratio: <br />119,739 - 26,000/20,887 = 4.487 <br />Given the agreed upon ratio, the county's residential land use <br />designations were acceptable to DCA. Subsequently, the stipulated <br />settlement agreement was implemented through an amendment to the <br />county's comprehensive plan. That amendment, which was found in <br />compliance by DCA, formally established 4.487 as an acceptable <br />residential allocation ratio for the county. <br />Since that time, however, changes affecting the number of units <br />allowed and the number of existing units have occurred. Land use <br />designation amendments involving_ residentially designated land <br />within the urban service area affect the number of units allowed. <br />Since plan adoption, several land use amendments involving <br />residentially designated land within the urban service area have <br />been adopted. The effect of these amendments has been a net <br />decrease of 109 units allowed. Therefore, land use plan amendments <br />have reduced the number of units allowed from 119,739 to 119,630. <br />The following tables depict the information used to determine the <br />change in the number of units. Since the C/I designation is not <br />intended for residential uses, land use amendments redesignating <br />land to CII reduce the number of units allowed, while amendments <br />redesignating land to residential increase the number of units <br />allowed. Staff estimates that 25% of land designated for <br />residential uses is used for infrastructure such as roads and <br />stormwater retention. Therefore, the net developable acreage is <br />75% of the total acreage. <br />LAND USE AMENDMENTS TO COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL <br />AMEND. TOTAL NET NET DECREASE <br />NAME FROM UNITS/AC. ACRES ACRES IN UNITS <br />Korine __ <br />L-1 <br />3/1 <br />_ 15.00 <br />11.25 <br />_ 33 <br />Smith <br />L-2 <br />6/1 <br />1.86 <br />1.40 <br />8 <br />Koerner <br />M-1 <br />8/1 <br />0.31 <br />0.23 <br />1 <br />Seb. Assoc. <br />L-2 <br />6/1 <br />4.00 <br />3.00 <br />18 <br />72 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.