My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/12/1994
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1994
>
4/12/1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:04:24 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 1:55:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/12/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
APR 121994 <br />BOOK 92 PA'r'.,,J&" <br />roads and stormwater retention. Removing land used for <br />infrastructure leaves up to 119.25 acres for residences. At the <br />proposed density of up to 3 units/acre, 358 units could be built on <br />the subject property. This is an increase of 239 units over the <br />119 units that could be built under the existing designation of up <br />to 1 unit/acre. Therefore, the proposed amendment increases the <br />total number of units allowed by 239. <br />The impact of this increase in total number of units allowed on the <br />residential allocation ratio would be as follows: <br />1. Total number of units allowed (119,591 + 239): 119,830 <br />2. Existing units: 27,939 <br />3. Projected number of units needed (1990-2010): 20,887 <br />4. Residential Allocation Ratio with the Adoption of the Proposed <br />Amendment: 119,830 - 27,939/20,887 = 4.399 <br />As indicated, with the adoption of the proposed amendment, the <br />residential allocation ratio would be 4.399, less than the approved <br />ratio of 4.487. <br />Staff is currently undertaking a Urban Service Area Vacant Land <br />Analysis to provide detailed information regarding the amount of <br />vacant land, the number of vacant platted lots, the number of <br />existing units, the number of potential new units, and the current <br />residential allocation ratio. When complete, that analysis will <br />provide even better information to use in calculating the county's <br />residential allocation ratio. <br />Consistency with Comprehensive Plan <br />Land use amendment requests are reviewed for consistency with all <br />policies of the comprehensive plan. As per section 800.07(1) of <br />the LDRs, the "comprehensive plan -may only be amended in such a way <br />as to preserve the internal consistency of the plan pursuant to <br />Section 163.3177(2) F.S." Amendments must also show consistency <br />with the overall designation of land uses as depicted on the Future <br />Land Use Map, which includes agricultural, residential, <br />recreational, conservation, and commercial and industrial land uses <br />and their densities. <br />The goals, objectives and policies are the most important parts of <br />the comprehensive plan. Policies are statements in the plan which <br />identify actions which the county will take in order to direct the <br />community's development. As courses of action committed to by the <br />county, policies provide the basis for all county land development <br />related decisions --including plan amendment decisions. While all <br />comprehensive plan objectives and policies are important, some have <br />more applicability than others in reviewing plan amendment <br />requests. Of particular applicability for this request are the <br />following objectives and policies. <br />- Future Land Use Element Policy 13.3 <br />In evaluating a land use amendment request, the most important <br />consideration is Future Land Use Element Policy 13.3. This policy <br />requires that one of three criteria be met in order to approve a <br />land use amendment request. These criteria are: <br />• a mistake in the approved plan; <br />• an oversight in the approved plan; or <br />74 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.