My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/12/1994
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1994
>
4/12/1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:04:24 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 1:55:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/12/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6)OUR 92 -LrtiuF. 16 <br />School. The subject property borders the City of Sebastian and <br />lies one half of a mile from the Vero Lake Estates subdivision <br />which has the same land use designation as that requested for the <br />subject property. Additionally, the zoning of the land in the City <br />of Sebastian that abuts the subject property permits a higher <br />density than that requested for the subject property. For these <br />reasons, the proposed amendment is consistent with Future Land Use <br />Element Policy 1.11. <br />Future Land Use Element Policy 4.1 <br />Future Land Use Element Policy 4.1 states that land use categories <br />shall be designated in a manner which concentrates urban uses, <br />thereby discouraging urban sprawl. <br />By increasing the density of land currently within the urban <br />service area, as opposed to expanding the urban service area, the <br />proposed amendment concentrates growth in the area designated for <br />urban uses. For this reason, the proposed amendment is consistent <br />with Future Land Use Element Policy 4.1. <br />- Mass Transit Element Policy 1.2 <br />Mass Transit Element Policy 1.2 states that the county will, <br />through the future land use element, provide higher densities along <br />major transportation corridors in order to facilitate future mass <br />transit provision. Since the proposed amendment will increase the <br />allowed density along C.R. 510, which is a major transportation <br />corridor, this request is consistent with Mass Transit Element <br />Policy 1.2. <br />As part of its consistency analysis, staff compared the proposed <br />request to all the policies in the plan and found no conflicts. <br />Therefore, staff's position is that the proposed amendment is <br />consistent with the comprehensive plan. <br />Compatibility with the Surrounding Area <br />Staff's position is that granting the request to redesignate the <br />subject property to L-1 would result in development which would be <br />compatible with surrounding areas. Although bordered on all sides <br />by groves or the St. Sebastian River, the subject property, at <br />approximately 159 acres, is large enough to buffer itself from the <br />adjacent agricultural uses (as required in Future Land Use Element <br />Policy 6.3 and in section 911.04(3)(c)5b of the County LDRs). <br />Despite the fact that it is currently used for groves, the land to <br />the north, east, and west is designated for future low density <br />residential development. In fact, the adjacent land in the City of <br />Sebastian is designated for a higher density than that requested <br />for the subject property. <br />For these reasons, staff feels the requested L-1 land use <br />designation would be compatible with the surrounding area. <br />Potential Impact on Environmental Oualit <br />Environmental impacts of residential development on the subject <br />property would be essentially the same under either the existing or <br />the proposed land use designation. <br />Changing the land use designation of the subject property from R to <br />L-1 may enhance environmental quality by encouraging residential <br />development of the site which is currently a grove. <br />76 <br />M M M <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.