Laserfiche WebLink
M _ <br />The environmental quality of the site may be enhanced by <br />residential development, because site development would result in <br />construction of a stormwater management system, installation of a <br />shoreline protection buffer, and protection of jurisdictional <br />wetlands on site. Due to the county's stormwater retention <br />requirements for residential development, residential development <br />on the subject property would also reduce the amount of stormwater <br />runoff outfalling to the St. Sebastian River. The requirements <br />for residential development contrast with the present agricultural <br />design that allows drainage directly into the St. Sebastian River <br />without any' stormwater retention. Therefore, t_he required <br />stormwater management associated with residential development <br />should reduce the amount of pollutants and freshwater runoff that <br />is currently placed into the river via the approximately 159 acre <br />agricultural operation. <br />Additionally, in conjunction with subdivision plat approvals, the <br />applicant would be required to maintain a shoreline protection <br />buffer zone along the St. Sebastian River (929.06). Since the new <br />subdivision parcels would be created after June 18, 1991, the <br />applicant would be required to maintain a 100 foot shoreline <br />protection buffer zone along the St. Sebastian River (measured from <br />the mean high water mark). <br />All jurisdictional wetlands located on the parcel are protected by <br />federal, state, and county regulations. Wetlands associated with <br />the St. Sebastian River must retain a Con -2, Wetlands Conservation <br />District, (1 unit/40 acre) zoning designation, in accordance with <br />the County Comprehensive Plan and LDRs (reference Future Land Use <br />Policy 1.31, LDR Section 911.05(3)(x)). For these reasons, <br />significant adverse environmental impacts associated with this <br />request are not anticipated. <br />Alternatives <br />The applicant has three alternatives regarding development of the <br />subject property. These alternatives are: <br />1. Create and develop a subdivision of one -acre single-family <br />lots under the current land use designation. Because of <br />infrastructure requirements, the total number of lots created <br />will be less than one/acre. <br />2. Create a Residential Planned Development under the current <br />land use designation. This alternative gives the applicant <br />site design options such as the clustering of development. <br />With respect to the subject property, up to 159 units could be <br />built on a portion of the property, while the balance of the <br />land would remain in agriculture or open space. The <br />undeveloped land could be developed in the future if the <br />underlying land use designation were ever changed to a higher <br />density. <br />3. Request a land use designation amendment allowing more intense <br />development of the subject property. This is the alternative <br />the applicant has chosen. If this request is denied, the <br />applicant's other two options for site development remain. <br />With respect to this request, the Board of County Commissioners has <br />two principal alternatives, approval or denial. <br />The Board can also direct staff to examine the land use designation <br />of the entire C.R. 510 corridor. Given changes, such as new <br />utility lines that have been installed in that area, such an <br />examination may be warranted. <br />APR 121994 <br />77 <br />bOCIK 9 F,Avr168 <br />