Laserfiche WebLink
Fr- -1 <br />APR 2 6 1994 ROOF 9;? PAGE298 <br />Director Davis reported that our application is not complete <br />as yet, but County staff is finalizing a letter to respond to the <br />questions raised by the Department of Environmental Protection <br />(DEP) . It is our feeling that the DEP is mainly concerned with the <br />impact these units may have on the shoreline. He expected that <br />when the permit is issued, there probably will be some conditions <br />to mitigate anything that the modeling might show, such as sand <br />placement or something to that effect. The question today is <br />whether to issue an order to American Coastal to proceed with the <br />fabrication of 1,000 units as discussed at last week's meeting. <br />Commissioner Adams reported that she.talked with Kirby Green <br />of the DEP last Thursday and he reconfirmed his willingness to work <br />with the County. Don Donaldson reports that the physical modeling <br />is going real well. In addition, we received the good news last <br />Friday that the Wetland Resource Department of the DEP has found <br />our application complete. They do have a few items they want us to <br />clarify, but they do not see any problem with the reef. The <br />wetlands permit is the first of four permits. <br />Commissioner Adams felt comfortable with Kirby Green's letter <br />of April 22, 1994, and wished to note that the window is narrowing <br />for constructing the reef this summer. <br />Chairman Tippin commended Commissioner Adams on her massive <br />efforts to get the PEP reef through the permitting process. <br />However, his personal view is that the DEP continues to be an <br />abomination and he just doesn't trust them. He could not support <br />a motion to do anything ahead of having a permit in hand from this <br />outfit. <br />Commissioner Eggert also appreciated Commissioner Adams' <br />fantastic effort in getting the PEP reef permitted. She still felt <br />this is worth considering in terms of cautiously going ahead. <br />However, she questioned the wording in Mr. Green's letter about <br />modifying the proposed configuration of the units. <br />For better understanding of the letter, Commissioner Macht <br />suggested substituting the word "placement" for "configuration." <br />Director Davis returned to the question of issuing a notice to <br />proceed on the fabrication of units. <br />Commissioner Bird understood that if we give the go ahead for <br />the fabrication of units, we would be obligated to buy the units <br />once they'are built. <br />Director Davis explained that -there is a mobilization charge <br />of $200,000 to build the units and another $200,000 mobilization <br />charge to install the first 1000 feet of units. <br />45 <br />