Laserfiche WebLink
The Board reviewed the Six -Year Emergency Services Plan <br />Revision Recommendations, which includes the estimated maintenance <br />costs of the 800 MHz Communications System. <br />SAID DOCUMENT IS ON FILE <br />IN THE COUNTY COMMISSION OFFICES <br />Administrator Chandler announced that the next area of <br />discussion will be the County Administration Building. He directed <br />the Board's attention to Exhibit IV: <br />DATE: APRIL 19, 1994 <br />TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER EXH I B IT IV <br />COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR <br />FROM: H.T. "SONNY- DEAN, DIRECTO <br />DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES <br />SUBJECT: VOA STUDY - COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING <br />As per your request, the following information is furnished in <br />respect to the 1991 VOA study as related to a new county <br />administration building complex. <br />Three options for the complex were looked at. Option one was to <br />locate the new facility north of the present building. Option two <br />was to move the School District out and renovate the present <br />facility. Option three was to purchase property and construct a <br />new building in the downtown area. <br />COMPARISON OF OPTIONS <br />OPTION 1: Base Costs <br />Furnishings <br />Subtotal <br />Sale of Buildings <br />Total Option #1 <br />OPTION 2: Base Costs <br />Furnishing <br />Total Option #2 <br />OPTION 3: Base Costs <br />Furnishings <br />Total Option #3 <br />$18,012,667 <br />1,284.531 <br />19,297,198 <br />(7,246,994) <br />iAJ12,050,204 <br />•$16,343,582 <br />1,284,531 <br />$17,628,113 <br />$25,121.227 <br />1,284,831 <br />$26,405,758 <br />Option 1 vs 2 Savings 5,577,907 <br />Option 1 vs 3 Savings 14,355,552 <br />Savings for Option 3 does not reflect loss of tax base for private <br />property on two city blocks. <br />It is also important to note that Option 1 includes a new <br />purchasing warehouse/building maintenance shop/storage facility at <br />a cost of $2,981,517. <br />Administrator Chandler emphasized that we have a space needs <br />and air quality problem in this building. Option 2, construction <br />of a new County Administration Building, is preferable to Option 1, <br />spending $1.7 million to renovate and repair the old building. The <br />question is whether we have the resources to construct a new <br />building within the time frame involved, considering our other <br />APR 2 8 1994 15 <br />BOOP( 92 PAfF 3`?0 <br />