My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/12/1994
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1994
>
7/12/1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:04:25 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 2:33:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/12/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BOOK 92 FACE 873 <br />15. "Zoning laws are in derogation of the common law and as a general rule are <br />subject to strict construction in favor of the right of a property owner to the <br />unrestricted use of his property. Permitted uses must be interpreted broadly, <br />prohibited uses strictly so that doubts are resolved in a property owner's favor." <br />(City of South Miami) <br />This excerpt is a statement of the general law and should come as no surprise to anyone. <br />No one has ever suggested that the applicant does not have the right to use their property. See <br />my comment under Excerpt #12. <br />The relevancy of this excerpt to site plan review standards is questionable, since this <br />excerpt deals with the overall concept of zoning. If there were any ambiguities in the LDRs <br />suggesting that the land could not be used, then this excerpt would be useful; however, that is not <br />the case. There _gre volummes of quotes that can be pulled from cases dealing with property <br />rights; however, each one comes with a specific set of facts and circumstances that are used as <br />the basis for local governments decisions and for judicial review. The more reasoned court <br />decisions hold that every land owner has the right to a reasonable use of his land, not necessarily <br />the highest and best use. If you are aware of any facts that would suggest the property owner <br />will be denied a reasonable use of the land if the site plan is required to meet the applicable <br />LDR requirements, then I would like to know what they are. <br />This concludes my review of your June 17, 1994 Memorandum to the County <br />Commissioners. <br />In accordance with the previously agreed procedures by all parties, I request that you <br />forward a copy of this response to the County Commissioners simultaneously with your <br />Memorandum. If for some reason you elect not to forward your memorandum to the County <br />Commissioners prior to the July 12, 1994 meeting, I would like you to forward this response to <br />them anyway, so that they will have an opportunity to review it prior to the July 12th meeting. <br />Attorney Dill introduced Robert Salmon, 1155 Reef Road, <br />president of Windward, a condominium of 65 homeowners living across <br />the road from the proposed supermarket. <br />Mr. Salmon presented a black, 3 -ring binder (Exhibit 9) <br />containing one page of printed material plus an aerial view of the <br />site for the proposed project, a plat map of the Moorings, 26 color <br />photographs showing the entrances into the Moorings, various <br />residences in the Moorings, single-family homes on Bowline Drive <br />which will face the loading area for the supermarket, condominium <br />buildings, marinas, and material describing the Moorings Harbor <br />Square Development Plan which was approved by the IRC Planning & <br />Zoning Commission in 1989 but never built. Color photographs in <br />the back of the folder showed the loading areas and rear access <br />area of the Publix at Miracle Mile. <br />Mr. Salmon commented on Section 911.10 of Ordinance 90-16: <br />M <br />July 12, 1994 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.