7/12/1994 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I Botox 92 PALE 885 7. We believe to rule in favor of an individual, whose primary motive is profit, and against a great many individuals who have been lead to believe in the original concept for the development of this land, would be a miscarriage of justice. With all the other attendant degradations to the area --noise, sight pollution, security, traffic impact from both north and south on A -1-A already over capacity, drainage and environmental Problems, we strongly recommend you not approve this site plan. For a Bo _ of Directors, Robert M. Tenbus, President Wayne Varley, 875 Reef Road, explained that he represents the South Beach Property Association for 22 subdivisions in the South Beach area which contain approximately 2200 households. He emphasized that the Association represents more than 1000 registered voters who own properties that represent 18 percent of the ad valorem taxes collected for Indian River county. Based on the affirmation of the majority of its members, the Association opposes the development of any lands that will jeopardize the quality of life presently enjoyed within the South Beach boundaries. The present plan for a 27,000 sq. ft. supermarket is detrimental to that quality of life. Specifically, they object to the devaluation of real estate property, the overall increase of traffic on AlA, and the odors, noises, and other problems associated with the supermarket. Walter Bush, 1935 Mooringline Drive, wished to read into the record a letter from Peter B. Benedict, headmaster at St. Edwards School who had to leave early: "St. Edwards School is concerned for the safety of our students, parents, and visitors when they exit and enter our upper school campus. We believe that any commercial development at the Moorings would add significantly to the A1A traffic and thus aggravate what is already a dangerous traffic situation." George Torrency, resident of Vero Beach, advised that he is a retired university professor of law and government. He emphasized that there is no evidence at all to indicate that the owner or the developer of the subject property will suffer any pecuniary loss if 111 July 12, 1994 � s �