7/12/1994 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Attorney Evans announced that their presentation was concluded, but he requested some time at the end to address any issues raised in response to what they have presented. Attorney Steve Henderson, representing the Moorings, Property Owners Association and Jack MacLean, individually, distributed several pages of handout material. 'Noss, HENDERSON, VAN GAASBECE, BLANTON & ROVAL, P.A. July 7, 1994 VIA Hand Delivery Mr. Robert M. Keating, AICP INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 1840 25th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 RE: Appeal Under Section 902.07, Indian River County Code Dear Bob: On behalf of the Moorings Property Owners Association, Inc. and Jack MacLean, individually, please accept this letter as an appeal under §902.07 of your interpretative decision under §952.12 (9) of the Indian River County Code. In the Staff Report on the Moorings Project dated June 24, 1994, at the top of page 5 thereof, the Staff Report states: "Residents who have reviewed the revisions have raised a concern that the proposed additional median cut is spaced closer than the 330 foot separation distance referenced in LDR Section 952.12 (9)(b) the Public Works Department, however, has indicated that the 330 foot dimension is for traffic -way corridors (i.e. thoroughfare plan roads), where the median has a traffic control function rather than an aesthetic function. Since Mooringline Drive is classified as a local road and its primary function is to provide access to adjacent lots and tracts, it is the opinion of the Public Works Director that the spacing of the second median cut is not regulated pursuant to LDR Section 952.12 (9) (b) .11 July 129 1994 68 na � � , ATTORNEYS AT LAW DONALD C.FEUERBACH ROBIN A. BLANTON 817 BEACHLAND BOULEVARD LISA D. HARPRING KEVIN S. DOTY JUDITH GOODMAN HILL STEVE L. HENDERSON P, O. BOX 3406 FRED L. KRETSCHMER. JR. THOMAS A. KOVAL �c Y $$0 BEACH, FLORIDA 32964-3406 MARGARET S. LYON CLINTON W. LANIER LEWIS W. MURPHY. JR. GEORGE H. MOSS 1407, 231.1900 KATHLEEN WALSH STRATTON EVERETT J. VAN GAASBECK E. CLAYTON YATES FAX: 14071 231.4387 OF COUNSEL CHARLES E. GARRIS FORD J. FEGERT July 7, 1994 VIA Hand Delivery Mr. Robert M. Keating, AICP INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 1840 25th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 RE: Appeal Under Section 902.07, Indian River County Code Dear Bob: On behalf of the Moorings Property Owners Association, Inc. and Jack MacLean, individually, please accept this letter as an appeal under §902.07 of your interpretative decision under §952.12 (9) of the Indian River County Code. In the Staff Report on the Moorings Project dated June 24, 1994, at the top of page 5 thereof, the Staff Report states: "Residents who have reviewed the revisions have raised a concern that the proposed additional median cut is spaced closer than the 330 foot separation distance referenced in LDR Section 952.12 (9)(b) the Public Works Department, however, has indicated that the 330 foot dimension is for traffic -way corridors (i.e. thoroughfare plan roads), where the median has a traffic control function rather than an aesthetic function. Since Mooringline Drive is classified as a local road and its primary function is to provide access to adjacent lots and tracts, it is the opinion of the Public Works Director that the spacing of the second median cut is not regulated pursuant to LDR Section 952.12 (9) (b) .11 July 129 1994 68 na � � ,