My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/19/1994
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1994
>
7/19/1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:04:25 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 2:36:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/19/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RECONS FOR FUNDING COST OF LIVING <br />ADTUSTIVIENT FOR ALL COUNTY EMPLOYEES <br />County Administrator Jim Chandler recounted that at the budget <br />workshop the Board directed staff to make recommendations on <br />providing a Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) for County employees <br />and methods of funding a COLA, and staff has two alternatives, <br />depending on the Sheriff's planned step raise for his employees. <br />Administrator Chandler listed three changes in the budget: (1) <br />last week's presentation on the health insurance resulted in <br />savings; (2) cash balances in MSTU and Transportation budgets, and <br />(3 ) the State modif ied their f igures for the one-half cent sales <br />tax revenue and their estimate now is $57,000 better than <br />originally set out, although it is $57,000 less than the current <br />year. Funds from these three sources cannot provide a 2 percent <br />across the board COLA increase to begin on October 1, 1994, but we <br />may be able to provide a 2.2 percent increase if we were to begin <br />the adjustment on January 1, 1995. <br />The limitation involves the Sheriff's budget. The Sheriff's <br />budget includes $190,000 for a step program increase, and we have <br />recommended that his budget be reduced to the current year's level. <br />If he cannot reduce his budget, we have Alternate B, which could <br />provide a COLA increase of 1 percent on October 1, 1994, or 1.2 <br />percent increase on January 1, 1995. Staff reviewed and stretched <br />all sources to arrive at these recommendations. <br />Commissioner Bird asked for clarification of the sources of <br />funds for the 2.2 percent increase in Alternate A. <br />Administrator Chandler explained that the insurance consultant <br />transmitted rates which resulted in a savings of $184,000, which <br />was unexpected prior to last Thursday. The balance of the funds <br />for the 2.2 percent increase would come from the cash balances in <br />MSTU and Transportation budgets, and the $57,000 increase in the <br />State's estimate of our one-half cent sales tax revenue. Staff <br />predicated all these figures on the goal of no tax increase. <br />OMB Director Joe Baird emphasized that he could not guarantee <br />the funding for a COLA increase because of a contingency in the <br />Emergency Management Services budget. The funding is an estimate <br />at this time. He stressed that the millage rate must be set so <br />that the TRIM notices can be mailed out. The Sheriff's budget will <br />make a difference because 60 percent of law enforcement budget <br />comes from MSTU revenue while court services come from the General <br />Fund. <br />113 Box . �V,4 00( <br />July 19, 1994 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.