My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/19/1994
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1994
>
7/19/1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:04:25 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 2:36:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/19/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
800K 92 PALE 919 <br />S.R. 60 and 58th Avenue node's centralized location, and that <br />node's close proximity to the population center, expanding the S. R. <br />60 and 58th Avenue node boundary would provide for an efficient <br />land use pattern and for the maximum use of transportation and <br />public facilities, while at the same time decreasing strip <br />development, which would occur in other nodes if their areas were <br />increased to accommodate the acreage necessary for the subject <br />request. <br />Another issue involves the proposed Harbortown Mall. As adopted, <br />the Comprehensive Plan already includes an area for a regional <br />mall; that mall site is along U.S. #1 at 53rd Street. It is <br />generally accepted that, despite the rapid population growth in the <br />county, the population base is sufficient to support only one such <br />facility. -Despite the fact that one mall has already received <br />initial approval and that only one mall can survive to the county, <br />several reasons exist for the consideration of this request. <br />First, there are no guarantees that the Harbortown Mall will be <br />built. Prior to construction, certain public infrastructure <br />improvements must be completed or contracted; leases must be <br />obtained, and financing must be secured. Therefore, the advantage <br />enjoyed by the Harbortown Mall is the land use, zoning, and DRI <br />approval. Second, the prospect of competing regional mall sites <br />reduces the chance of speculation by holding commercially <br />designated land, and increases the likelihood of a regional mall <br />being constructed in the near future. <br />During the land use plan amendment review process for the <br />Harbortown Mall, staff recognized that there is probably no single <br />best site for such a facility and, therefore, provided <br />opportunities for competing proposals to be reviewed. Staff feels <br />that the subject property, like the Harbortown Mall property, <br />should not be used for "general commercial" development which does <br />not have the size requirements of a regional mall. <br />As previously noted, because this request is part of a DRI, the <br />county has certain control which is not available in a normal <br />rezoning or plan amendment. That control involves conditioning the <br />DRI Development Order. In this case, to ensure that the subject <br />property is not available for general commercial use (for which <br />there is sufficient land currently available), staff feels that the <br />Development Order should provide sufficient time for the county to <br />redesignate and rezone the property if a regional mall is not <br />constructed. The Harbortown Mall Development Order contains such <br />conditions, and the Development Order associated with this request <br />also contains such conditions. As a result, the Development Orders <br />remove the incentive for either developer to realize an economic <br />gain by obtaining a commercial land use designation and then <br />selling the property for general commercial use. <br />Concurrency of Public Facilities <br />This site is located within the county Urban Service Area, an area <br />deemed suited for urban scale development. The Comprehensive Plan <br />establishes standards for: Transportation, Potable Water, <br />Wastewater, Solid Waste, Drainage and Recreation (Future Land Use <br />Policy 3.1). The adequate provision of these services is necessary <br />to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the community. <br />The Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations also <br />require that new development be reviewed to ensure that the minimum <br />acceptable standards for these services and facilities are <br />maintained. <br />Policy 3.2 of the Future Land Use Element states that no <br />development shall be approved unless it is consistent with the <br />24 <br />July 199 1994 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.