My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/15/1994
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1994
>
8/15/1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:04:26 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 2:36:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/15/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BOOK 93 f'AGF <br />LDR FIRST HEARING CONSIDERATION OF ROAD FRONTAGE <br />REOMMIENTS FOR LOT SPLITS <br />The Board reviewed memo from Planning Director Stan Boling <br />dated August 9, 1994: <br />TO: James E. Chandler <br />County Administrator <br />DIV ION HEAD CONCURRENCE: <br />Robert M. Keg ng AIC <br />Community Development rector <br />Ao <br />FROM: Stan Boling, AICP <br />Planning Director <br />DATE: August 9, 1994 <br />SUBJECT: LDR First Hearing Consideration <br />Requirements for Lot Splits <br />of Road Frontage <br />It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal <br />consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its special <br />meeting of August 15, 1994, in conjunction with the other LDR <br />amendments to be considered at the same meeting. <br />DESCRIPTIONS & CONDITIONS: <br />Several months ago, Attorney Bruce Barkett appealed staff's <br />interpretation of the county's road frontage requirements. Because <br />staff's interpretation of the requirements had been applied for <br />many years and because of the importance and broad effect of <br />significant changes to the requirements, the Board of County <br />Commissioners considered and adopted an emergency ordinance on <br />April 5, 1994 to clarify beyond all doubt the county's current road <br />frontage requirements. During discussion of the emergency <br />ordinance, and at a subsequent meeting when the Board considered <br />Mr. Barkett's interpretation appeal, the Board directed staff to <br />review the road frontage requirements through the normal LDR <br />amendment process. <br />Staff has performed research on this subject, has analyzed the <br />current requirements, and has devised alternatives to the present <br />road frontage requirements. The PSAC considered this information <br />at its June 9, 1994 meeting and voted unanimously to keep the <br />existing LDR road frontage requirements as they are (as clarified <br />by the April 5, 1994 emergency ordinance), with no changes. On <br />July 14, 1994, the Planning and Zoning Commission considered this <br />matter and voted 5-0 to recommend that the Board keep the existing <br />LDR road frontage requirements as they are (see attachment #7). <br />The Board of County Commissioners is now to consider this matter <br />and determine whether to confirm the county's- existing road <br />frontage LDR requirements as reflected in the April 5, 1994 <br />emergency ordinance or to change the road frontage requirements. <br />August 15, 1994 <br />18 <br />M M <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.