Laserfiche WebLink
Planning staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners <br />re -affirm the road frontage requirement changes contained in the <br />emergency ordinance adopted on April 5, 1994, and direct staff to <br />incorporate into the proposed LDR amendment ordinance the April 5th <br />emergency ordinance changes, and similar changes to LDR Chapter <br />912, as shown in attachment #9 of this report. <br />REDDEN PLACE ALTERNATIVE (NOT RECOMMENDED BY STAFF) <br />Section 913.06(1).(C) is hereby amended to read as follows: <br />"(1) unlawful activity. It shall be unlawful and subject to <br />penalties provided herein for any person to: <br />(C) Divide property after December S. 1973 by any means where a <br />resulting lot does not have frontage on: a dedicated public <br />right-of-way, private platted right-of-way (street), or a <br />roadway historically and currently maintained by the county, <br />as referenced on the county road grading map, of at least: <br />1. Sixty (60) continuous feet, unless exempted under section <br />913.06(2), or unless the lot fronts upon a cul-de-sac or <br />curve and meets the requirements of section 913.09(6)(C), <br />for properties located within the A-1, A-2, A-3, Con -2, <br />Con -31 -RFD and RS -1 zoning districts; <br />2. The minimum lot width of the zoning district applicable <br />to the lot(s) created for properties located within <br />zoning districts other than those referenced in the <br />above' paragraph 1., unless exempted under section <br />913.06(2), or unless the lot fronts upon a cul-de-sac or <br />curve and meets the requirements of section 913.09(6)(c). <br />Access, ingress/egress; or other easements shall not be <br />deemed to constitute a publicly dedicated road right-of- <br />way unless previously dedicated to and accepted by the <br />county. Private access easements shall be considered <br />"private platted rights-of-way (street)' for purposes of <br />this section, if: <br />a. 'The physical roadway locate <br />existed prior to the c <br />requirement (December 8, 1� <br />b. The physical roadway has <br />local road standards (2 <br />develonmentl! arm <br />c. A nota <br />respons <br />cow <br />for ma <br />erf orm <br />d. _The per <br />obtains <br />va <br />rized letter fron <br />ible for road main <br />_indicating the pei <br />Lntenance and the - <br />ad; <br />s) proposing the <br />dministrative <br />within the easement(s <br />inty's road frontag <br />3)• and <br />_width meeting count <br />for single famil <br />_the person or entitv <br />?nance is filed with the <br />on or entity responsible <br />method of maintenance <br />_lot split files for and <br />approval from staff, <br />are satisfied rpffarA4". <br />Note: Parcels created between September 21, 1990 and <br />December 4, 1991 are subject to the sixty (60) continuous <br />feet (rather .than a minimum lot width) frontage <br />requirement, regardless of the zoning district in which <br />the property is located. 23 <br />August 159 1994 MJ I n - <br />78 <br />