8/15/1994 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• . "Parcels created 990 and December 4, 1991 are subject to the sixty ( 6 0 ) continuous feet (rather than a minimum lot width) frontage requirement, regardless of the zoning district in which the property is located. *Note: Although changes to section 912.06(3)(c) were not made as part of the April 5th emergency ordinance, such changes should now be made to ensure that this Chapter 912 section parallels section 913.06(1)(c). Coding: Words in � type are deletions from existing law. Words underlined are additions. 1 Director Boling illustrated with the aid of graphics the situation on Hedden Place which caused the Board to consider Road Frontage Requirements for Lot Splits. The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in this matter. Bruce Barkett, local attorney who represented Mr. Van Vorst at prior hearings, stated that he was not representing anyone. He pointed out that staff followed the Board's direction and presented an alternative which would allow people like Mr. Van Vorst to make application for a lot split. Mr. Barkett proposed that the Board adopt staff's alternative to give the Board authority to grant a permit on a case by case basis so that somebody like Mr. Van Vorst is not stopped by blind application of the ordinances. Community Development Director Bob Keating preferred some standards or criteria rather than decisions on a case by case basis. One major requirement is that there be a maintenance entity identified to provide assurance that maintenance of the road will continue. Public Works Director Jim Davis agreed, and added that the criteria should indicate that the road be maintained comparable to a county maintained unpaved road. Discussion ensued regarding the evaluation of Hedden Place, and Mr. Barkett conceded that Hedden Place does not meet the 75 - 25 August 15, 1994 BOOK .FA��