Laserfiche WebLink
e: <br />Bou 93 PA,E.327 <br />Environmental Impacts <br />The Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission (GFC), in a 1989 <br />technical report, identified approximately 2,709 acres of viable <br />(relatively undisturbed) scrub habitat remaining in Indian River <br />County; 900 acres (33%) of that total occur along the St. Sebastian <br />River. Approximately 300 acres along the east bank are dominated <br />by xeric hammocks undergoing sporadic development. The remaining <br />600 acres along the west bank are a mosaic of xeric hammock, <br />scrubby flatwoods, sand pine scrub, dry prairie, pine flatwoods, <br />and forested wetlands. <br />The combination of the mentioned natural communities provides <br />significant biological benefits beyond each individual, separate <br />community type.Ospreys, bald eagles, and river otters are <br />examples of wildlife found in the St. Sebastian River area that <br />utilize the combined upland/wetland St. Sebastian River ecosystem. <br />The GFC describes the area as one of the most valuable natural <br />areas . remaini,Ag• in -the county. �D <br />The ecological value of the-St.`Sebastiarr River area xeric scrub is, <br />higher than other scrub areas in the county because of the <br />relatively large size of the St. Sebastian area scrub as well as <br />its association with other complementary habitats, and its <br />presently undisturbed/unencroached status. Other xeric scrub areas <br />in the developing portion of Indian River County have been largely <br />isolated by urban development, are relatively small in size or are <br />not part of a large, diverse ecological system such as the St. <br />Sebastian River area. Thus, the St. Sebastian River area xeric <br />scrub community was given extra consideration in its conservation <br />designation. <br />To provide adequate environmental protection, the proposed <br />amendment contains special restrictions and regulations for <br />development within the C-3 land use designation. For example, the <br />additions to Conservation Element Policy 6.16 would require <br />developers within the C-3 area to: <br />• conduct a survey for listed plants and animals; <br />• preserve 80% of the scrub habitat; <br />• design all access roads to avoid impacts to wildlife; <br />• if feasible, design the development pattern to allow <br />prescription burning; and <br />• develop and implement a detailed habitat management plan. <br />Besides these provisions, the proposed amendment also addresses <br />infrastructure. The soil west of the river (largely Electra fine <br />sand), while not ideal for individual septic systems, has been <br />identified by local soil scientists as one of the better soils in <br />the county for septic drainfields, provided river setback and soil <br />modification precautions are taken. The modification to Sanitary <br />Sewer Sub -Element Policy 6.1 would, under certain conditions, allow <br />community septic systems for clustered developments. These <br />provisions will ensure that negative- water quality impacts <br />associated with individual septic systems will not occur. <br />The modifications to Policy 1.31 of the Future Land Use Element <br />provide that the exact boundaries,.of the -.C-3 District shall be <br />determined by environmental survey ...of.. , soils. -.and vegetation...-_ <br />Because the -intent -,of .the 'C-3 designat3onJ-A'.to­prote`c�,rolaetivOk <br />.iindisti.,-bed' aresou-rces; disturbed areas-* east ----a the'.St9 Sebastian =_ <br />River that ' are within the general boundaries- of • the C-3 land use <br />designation and which no longer have wetland or scrub <br />characteristics could appropriately revert to a compatible higher <br />density, such as R, Rural, 1 unit/acre. The 1 unit/acre density in <br />September 20, 1994 36 <br />M <br />M <br />