My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/20/1994
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1994
>
9/20/1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:04:26 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 2:41:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/20/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M <br />along the river or any tributary, whichever is greater. The design of any <br />residential development shall restrict boat access to the river consistent with <br />federal, state and local laws and regulations providing for the protection of <br />manatees. To further protect manatees, only non -motorized boats will be <br />allowed in association with development on the west side of the St. Sebastian <br />River. Because of the importance of the community ps an intact natural <br />._system, areas designated as- set -asides must contain ecologically adequate <br />habitat to maintain and preserve the natural functions and character of this <br />community. * No off-site mitigation for such area shall be permitted. The <br />county shall encourage the conservation of this xeric scrub community by <br />establishing density transfer and cluster development land use regulations to <br />limit the impact of development on this property. Appropriate infrastructure <br />such as central sewer service and surface water management systems may be <br />required for the protection of the St. Sebastian . River ecosystem. In <br />addition, the following criteria must be met: <br />° Prior to the submittal of any plan of development, the site shall be <br />surveyed by a qualified biologist or ecologist for the presence of <br />plant and animal species listed as endangered, threatened or as <br />species of special concern by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, <br />Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, or the Florida <br />Department of Agriculture. The survey methodology shall be one <br />that is professionally accepted and applied. Among the species <br />anticipated to be located on the site are the Florida scrub jay, <br />gopher tortoise, gopher frog, Florida mouse and eastern Indigo. <br />snake. <br />° The clustered development shall preserve 80% of the scrub habitat <br />as part of an intact contiguous natural system and include the <br />critical habitat needed to maintain viable populations of the listed <br />species' on-site. To the extent environmentally and economically <br />feasible, development sites shall be selected to avoid occupied <br />habitat in order to minimize the need to relocate threatened and <br />endangered species. <br />° Access roads shall be constructed and located to avoid impacts to <br />wildlife. In particular, access roads shall be designed to minimize <br />any effect they may have as barriers by employing road design <br />standards which take into account natural features and wildlife <br />habits . • Such design standards shall include, but are not limited <br />to: minimum pavement width and shoulders; one-way roadways <br />wherever possible; minimum swales; orientation to minimize use by <br />animals as resting/sunning areas; reducing speed limits to under <br />30 miles per hour; and signage to remind users to be watchful of <br />wildlife. <br />° The development pattern shall be designed to allow prescription <br />burning of the preserve area; however, see below. <br />° A habitat management plan shall be prepared and approved for the <br />scrub preserve prior to final development approval that <br />a. includes a schedule for prescription burning in stages over <br />time to ensure viable habitat remains for the listed species at <br />all times. A prescribed or controlled burn is the preferred <br />management method. In the event that excessive smoke would <br />prevent a burn permit from being issued, then mechanical <br />clearing of some vegetation prior to the prescribed burn <br />would be the next best alternative to pursue. The last <br />alternative is mechanical clearing and no use of fire. Any <br />mechanical clearing of vegetation must avoid disturbing the <br />soil to the extent that it affects the ve-establishment of the <br />scrub habitat, and <br />September 20, 1994 45 <br />BOOK 93 FAGS 3 <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.