Laserfiche WebLink
impact fees currently being held which have not passed <br />the six-year refund period. <br />Commissioner Davis was opposed to retaining the homeowners' money for an additional <br />three-year period. <br />The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION, and by a 3-2 <br />vote (Commissioners Davis and Solari opposed), the <br />Motion carried. The Board approved a three year <br />extension of the six-year time period in which the impact <br />fees may be spent or encumbered, for the impact fees <br />currently being held which have not passed the six-year <br />refund period. <br />Attorney Polackwich continued with Issue W. Should the Three -Year Optional <br />Extension Apply to All Impact Fees or Just Traffic Impact Fees. He provided his <br />recommendation to apply the extension to all of the impact fee funds. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Flescher, <br />SECONDED by Vice Chairman O'Bryan, to apply the <br />three-year extension option for the impact fees to all <br />impact fee funds. <br />Vice Chairman O'Bryan clarified with Attorney Polackwich that the three year extension <br />is an option that may be applied to one or more specific impact fee funds, not a blanket extension <br />for all of the impact fee funds. <br />The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION, and by a 3-2 <br />vote (Commissioners Davis and Solari opposed), the <br />Motion carried. The Board approved to apply the three <br />February 21, 2012 26 <br />