My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/21/2012 (4)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2012
>
02/21/2012 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/20/2018 4:25:39 PM
Creation date
3/20/2018 4:21:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/21/2012
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
year extension option for the impact fees to all impact fee <br />funds. <br />Attorney Polackwich presented Issue V. What is the Exact Date on Which Ownership is <br />Determined if the Refund is to be Made to the Current Owner. He explained his <br />recommendation to establish property ownership on the first day following the last day of the <br />six-year impact fee refund period. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Solari, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Davis, the Board unanimously approved to <br />set the date to determine property ownership of impact fee <br />refund recipients as the first day following the expiration <br />of the six-year refund period for a certain impact fee fund. <br />Attorney Polackwich noted that the revised ordinance will state that any individual who <br />gets an impact fee refund for a project that has not been constructed will be charged a new <br />impact fee if the project is developed in the future. <br />Mr. Wilson mentioned that the original proposal for the revised impact fee ordinance had <br />reduced the time period for the application process for a refund from one year to four months. <br />He stressed that the application process may take as long as one year to complete. <br />Attorney Polackwich explained that the one-year period was instigated when the owner <br />was getting no notice; the application period was shortened because the property owners would <br />now be receiving a notice of refund eligibility. However, he stated that the final ordinance might <br />extend the time period for completion of the refund process to six months. <br />Chairman Wheeler wanted to know what would be the drawback to allowing one year, <br />instead of four or six months, for the refund process. <br />Commissioner Davis declared that he did not see any problems. <br />February 21, 2012 27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.