My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/13/2018 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2018
>
02/13/2018 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2021 12:33:55 PM
Creation date
4/4/2018 2:30:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
02/13/2018
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
294
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I/ <br />render the existing nursery area a virtual dead zone. This appears to be an unacceptable risk, when the <br />existing limestone road has proven for decades to be compatible with the conservation area. <br />Regarding the proposed placement of additional markers in the water, I would argue that Oslo Road has <br />one of the best marked areas in the entire County. Since the Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission is <br />required to permit all placement of markers in the Lagoon, I would like to request a copy of the permit <br />the County received from them, to see if any criteria exists regarding the number of markers allowed <br />per 100 feet. I am concerned because as a licensed boat captain I would think too many markers in an <br />area may pose a serious navigational hazard at night, outside of the manatee slow speed season. <br />Manatees are another issue that needs some clarification. Yes, the area around the City power plant <br />was historically a "hot spot" for manatees. As a previous US Fish and Wildlife Service Biologist who <br />evaluated manatee issues, I can assure you that this has no validity anymore, since the power plant that <br />attracted manatees has not been operational for some time now. I fish this area regularly, and it <br />currently gets no more manatee use than any other canal area in the County. Dan Harley, who lives on <br />the canal along the power plant, stated to me that five years ago he used to see dozens of manatees in <br />the power plant canal at one time, but has only seen two manatees this entire winter. Also, this <br />potential ramp location has deep water access, with a year round manatee slow speed zone, all the way <br />to the Intra Coastal Waterway. Manatee safety should not be considered a valid issue at this site <br />anymore. <br />The concern in the Staff Report that the mangrove lined canal at the sewage treatment site would not <br />be allowed to be filled in by permitting agencies is valid, however, the potential ramp is currently being <br />discussed at the power plant site, not the sewage treatment site. The sewage treatment site, where the <br />ramp conceptual drawings were made, is also where the bridge abutments are located. The south side <br />of the power plant site has no environmental issues that I can identify that would preclude a boat ramp. <br />The water depths are deep enough all the way to the Intra Coastal Waterway, that the presence of <br />submerged vegetation would be almost impossible. <br />Choosing options four and five of the Staff report appear to be the best options for a number of reasons. <br />Maintaining the Oslo ramp and road area in its existing condition would allow historic boating use and <br />protect the areas that were purchased for conservation. This would also protect the critical gamefish <br />nursery that is like no other ever located in the entire 156 mile long Lagoon system. Option five at the <br />power plant site would benefit many more County residents than the Oslo site by allowing a boat ramp <br />for larger vessels, more trailer parking, and restroom facilities. The City power plant site is only three <br />miles and a four and a half minute drive from Oslo road. With the existing shopping center at Oslo road, <br />I doubt the traffic congestion would be any worse at the power plant location. Another consideration is <br />that the staff report indicated that both the US Army Corps of Engineers and St. John's Water <br />Management District would require new permit applications for the proposed Oslo alterations. <br />Therefore, it would appear the permitting requirements would be starting from the beginning regardless <br />of the decision to pursue the Oslo ramp or power plant location. <br />Thank you again Commissioners and let me end with a proposition. When I worked for the US Fish and <br />Wildlife Service I was trained and had years of experience reviewing the very kind of projects we are <br />discussing. If the Commissioners vote to choose options four and five, I offer my assistance free of <br />charge to help County staff obtain the necessary permits to place a boat ramp at the City power plant <br />site. Thank you and I would be happy to answer any questions the Commission may have. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.