Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />determinate for me but I just don't have it. <br />COMMISSIONER DAVIS: Well, and based on that <br />same thought is the fact that there's a railroad trestle <br />already there. It used to be dual, double -tracked. And <br />it's kind of like... it's about, like, what we would look <br />at an old grove before a development: There is no <br />environmental significance in an old grove. Therefore, <br />you know, it's not like being worried about the <br />environmental impact of a development over the top of the <br />grove so... <br />ATTORNEY REINGOLD: And this challenge, I think, <br />I think the issues that we've raised in our petition are <br />valid; I don't think they've gone through all the hoops; I <br />don't think they did all the necessary due diligence; and <br />I don't want anyone who read this record in the future to <br />believe that, Oh, we filed a bogus claim. I think that we <br />have very legitimate arguments. I think it's just a cost <br />benefit analysis discussion that we're having. <br />CHAIRMAN SOLARI: Aside from the old -- the <br />environmental things of whether you really think they're <br />necessary or not or somebody feels they're really <br />necessary, the other one is you have a better <br />understanding of how many paths we can at this point we <br />can go take and then it just a matter of you're going to <br />have to prioritize those paths. Is this one of the key <br />VERO BEACH COURT REPORTERS <br />772-231-2231 <br />13 <br />