Laserfiche WebLink
BOOK 93 PAGE 506 <br />ANALYSIS <br />We have negotiated a survey contract with our No. 1 ranked surveyor <br />for this work (See attached survey contract), the negotiated lump <br />sum for this work is $12,170.00. The total estimated project costs <br />are as follows: <br />CONSTRUCTION WITH 10% CONTINGENCY $ 660,000 <br />ENGINEERING 36,000 <br />SURVEY 12,170 <br />TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST <br />$ 708,170 <br />Funding for this project will be from the impact fee fund. <br />RECONIl MAATION <br />The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the <br />Board of County Commissioners approve the attached work <br />authorization with Masteller, Moler, and Reed, Inc., as presented. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously <br />approved Work Authorization with Masteller, <br />Moler, and Reed, Inc., for a total estimated <br />cost of $708,170, as recommended by staff. <br />PROPOSAL LETTER/AUTHORIZATION ON FILE <br />IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD <br />LETTER TO MR. DANNIE DECKER RE ANIMAL CONTROL MATTER <br />Chairman Tippin presented the following proposed letter and <br />asked for the Board's approval to send it: <br />Mr. Dannie Decker <br />2745 53rd Avenue <br />Vero Beach, Florida 32960 <br />Dear Mr. Decker: <br />This is in reply to your letter of October 7, 1994 where you <br />requested to be placed on the agenda again. The County has a <br />liberal policy of allowing citizens to appear before the Board to <br />present matters of concern that may be addressed by the Board. <br />In fact you were afforded this opportunity and allowed to speak <br />well beyond the five minutes usually allotted for speakers at the <br />last Commission meeting. <br />A review of your letter indicates that the matters you wish to now <br />address are matters for the courts or, in the case of code <br />interpretations, matters for staff charged with administering the <br />various chapters in the code to answer. I note that you presently <br />have an appeal pending in the Circuit Court against a County <br />Code Enforcement Board action. The County is a party to that <br />proceeding. <br />40 <br />October 11, 1994 <br />