My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/05/2013AP-B
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2013
>
11/05/2013AP-B
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2018 10:56:42 AM
Creation date
6/26/2018 10:57:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
11/05/2013
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Book and Page
195
Supplemental fields
FilePath
H:\Indian River\Network Files\SL00000G\S0004NT.tif
SmeadsoftID
14234
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
195
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
At least three other factors indicate that the proposed RM-3,RS-3,CON-2,and CG zoning districts <br /> �" would be appropriate for this portion of the county. Those are: the underlying designations on the <br /> Future Land Use Map of L-1, Low-Density Residential-1 (up to 3 units per acre), CII, Commercial <br /> and Industrial and C-2;the development pattern in this portion of the County; and the wetland area <br /> of subject property 5 that borders the Indian River Lagoon. <br /> As proposed, the RM-3 and RS-3 zoning of properties 2, 3, and 4 will be consistent with the <br /> properties' underlying L-I land use designation and will be compatible with the existing multiple- <br /> family zoning district to the south and the single-family residential zoning district to the north and <br /> west. While the River Club of Grand Harbor project to the south of the subject properties is built at <br /> a density of.39 units/acres, that property is developed with a mixture of multiple family and single <br /> family units and a golf course. That property is also separated from the subject properties by the <br /> North Relief Canal. Because of the substantial width of the North Relief Canal, there will be no <br /> compatibility issues between the subject properties and the developed properties to the south. <br /> It is also anticipated that no incompatibilities will arise between the subject properties and the <br /> adjacent RM-3, RS-3 or CG zoned properties to the west. As proposed, the requested zoning <br /> districts are a continuation of those established zoning districts and the development pattern in this <br /> portion of the county. <br /> As for the proposed CON-2 zoning on subject property 5, the C-2 land use designation currently <br /> recognizes this area as estuarine wetlands. In this case, the CON-2 zoning district will provide the <br /> necessary zoning to buffer the Indian River Lagoon from encroaching development and protect the <br /> �. estuarine wetlands along the lagoon. <br /> The aforementioned factors indicate a trend toward continued urbanization in this portion of the <br /> county and an opportunity for the county to protect valuable wetlands along the Indian River Lagoon. <br /> Those factors also indicate that the proposed request will result in an orderly and logical <br /> development pattern in the county.Therefore,no incompatibilities are anticipated to occur as a result <br /> of the proposed rezoning and small scale land use amendment. <br /> Potential Impact on Environmental Quality <br /> Overall, the environmental impact of the requested land use amendment and rezoning will be no <br /> different from the environmental impact associated with the existing zoning allowances. Since a <br /> majority of the subject properties contains citrus groves and wooded areas, those areas are not <br /> designated as environmentally important or environmentally sensitive by the comprehensive plan. <br /> While a portion of the subject properties consists of wetlands,those wetlands are designated as C-2 <br /> on the future land use map, are environmentally sensitive, and will be rezoned to CON-2. <br /> Because there is an eagle's nest immediately adjacent to the southern boundary of subject property 3, <br /> any development on the subject properties will need to maintain a protective buffer of 750 to 1500 <br /> feet from that nest.Also,the U.S.Fish and Wildlife Agency must approve any development adjacent <br /> to that buffer. Even with an eagles nest adjacent to the subject properties,development can occur on <br /> the subject properties without there being any adverse environmental impacts as long as endangered <br /> species requirements are followed.For those reasons,no significant adverse environmental impacts <br /> associated with this request are anticipated. <br /> 14 <br /> 163 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.